-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05.02.14 07:57, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 10:42 PM, Charly Avital wrote:
>> Doug Barton wrote on 2/5/14, 6:00 AM:
>>> I have a correspondent whose "key1" has been on my key ring for
>>> years. They recently sent me "key2" which they would
Hi Doug,
> ... and while I'm sending messages anyway, I have been wondering for a
> while now what happened to the idea that was kicked around a ways back
> about enigmail doing "opportunistic" encryption. The idea being that if
> I am writing a message to someone (or some set of someones) and I h
> -Original Message-
> From: enigmail-users-boun...@enigmail.net [mailto:enigmail-users-
> boun...@enigmail.net] On Behalf Of Patrick Brunschwig
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 2:00 AM
> To: Enigmail user discussion list
> Subject: Re: [Enigmail] How do I choose amongst multiple keys
Well, to me it would also make sense to encrypt to the newest key by
default (by creation date), which would eliminate the need to create a per
recipient rule in most cases...
Having per recipient rules also brings the necessity to manage and maintain
those rules.
Onno
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:
On 02/05/2014 10:06 AM, Onno Ekker wrote:
> Well, to me it would also make sense to encrypt to the newest key by
> default (by creation date), which would eliminate the need to create a per
> recipient rule in most cases...
> Having per recipient rules also brings the necessity to manage and mainta
On 05/02/14 16:06, Onno Ekker wrote:
> Well, to me it would also make sense to encrypt to the newest key by
> default (by creation date), which would eliminate the need to create a per
> recipient rule in most cases...
Do we have an idea of cases / scenarios where per-recipient rules are
necessary
