A few thoughts on my own experience...
My friends who do not encrypt all say they have nothing to hide, or I only
email regular stuff and the government are welcome to read it and get bored,
that's the standard response I get.
Only one commented, "Will I have to do anything different from what
A few thoughts on my own experience...
My firiends who do not encrypt all say they have nothing to hide, or I only
email regular stuff and the government are welcome to read it and get bored,
that's the standard response I get.
Only one commented, "Will I have to do anything different from what
On Wed 2015-03-18 15:24:50 -0400, Doug Barton wrote:
> I've done what you've done in the past, sit down with a room full of
> people and explain to them how PGP works, the barest of fundamentals
> they need to know in order to get started, and walked through some demo
> e-mails. I've done this w
On 3/18/15 1:10 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
That's a totally non-sequitur argument...
That's because it's not an argument. It's showing you that you're
arguing from one particular viewpoint, and the other viewpoint is every
bit as valid. They are just as correct to question your existence as
> That's a totally non-sequitur argument...
That's because it's not an argument. It's showing you that you're
arguing from one particular viewpoint, and the other viewpoint is every
bit as valid. They are just as correct to question your existence as
you are to question theirs. And they are als
On 3/18/15 12:49 PM, Onno Ekker wrote:
On 18-3-2015 20:24, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm not sure that's necessary ... a good graphics person could come up
with a "least common denominator" button that would fit in with all 3
platforms.
In add-ons it is perfectly possible to create different skins f
On 3/18/15 9:01 AM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
I should add that one of the outcome if the usability study we had
last year showed that this is an important function and that such a
button was missing -
Was that study published anywhere? If not, can you make it available? I
would love to know
On 18-3-2015 20:24, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 3/18/15 5:54 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> On Wed 2015-03-18 03:23:04 -0400, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 3/17/15 11:03 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
My composition toolbar currently already has:
Send | Spelling | Attach | S/MIME | Sav
I like the 'Attach My Public Key' button, its so handy where it now is...
Ian
On 19/03/15 06:35, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 3/18/15 7:53 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>>> But what percentage of overall enigmail users are they, and how
>>> likely are they to blindly send their key to a keyserver rather
On 3/18/15 7:53 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
But what percentage of overall enigmail users are they, and how
likely are they to blindly send their key to a keyserver rather then
blindly click a button to attach their public key?
Try turning your question around. Consider if one of them were to
On 3/18/15 5:54 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Wed 2015-03-18 03:23:04 -0400, Doug Barton wrote:
On 3/17/15 11:03 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
My composition toolbar currently already has:
Send | Spelling | Attach | S/MIME | Save
Yes, that's the default, and I have those as well (ico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/18/2015 12:01 PM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> I should add that one of the outcome if the usability study we had
> last year showed that this is an important function and that such a
> button was missing - especially for beginners who don't wan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18.03.15 15:53, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> But what percentage of overall enigmail users are they, and how
>> likely are they to blindly send their key to a keyserver rather
>> then blindly click a button to attach their public key?
[...]
>
> If
On 18/03/2015 12:57 pm, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote:
> On 18.03.15 12:11, Bob Henson wrote:
>> I just installed the new GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 vanilla.
>> I couldnot access the Enigmail key management window at all -
>> getting the following error message:-
>
>> error The spinner was indica
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/03/2015 20:22, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote:
> On 17.03.15 20:00, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
>> +1. Perhaps Patrick could point us to a beginners' guide
>> detailing the differences?
>
> Inline-PGP: The traditional method. It dates back to the 90s. Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/03/2015 19:54, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> +1. Perhaps Patrick could point us to a beginners' guide
>> detailing the differences?
>
> https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#use_pgpmime
>
Thanks
Anne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
> But what percentage of overall enigmail users are they, and how
> likely are they to blindly send their key to a keyserver rather then
> blindly click a button to attach their public key?
Try turning your question around. Consider if one of them were to ask,
"But what percentage of overall Enig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 18.03.15 12:11, Bob Henson wrote:
> I just installed the new GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 vanilla.
> I couldnot access the Enigmail key management window at all -
> getting the following error message:-
>
> error The spinner was indicating tha
On Wed 2015-03-18 03:23:04 -0400, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 3/17/15 11:03 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> My composition toolbar currently already has:
>>
>> Send | Spelling | Attach | S/MIME | Save
>
> Yes, that's the default, and I have those as well (icons and text).
thanks for the reportback
On Wed 2015-03-18 03:26:02 -0400, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> Yes, I think we can move away from enigmail-x-y to enigmail-x.y. I'll
> try to remember this when doing the next release.
great, thanks! If it would help any to have this decision recorded in
the repo, you could duplicate the 1-8 tag a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I confirm issues with Enigmail 1.8 in combination with GPG4win 2.2.4 (full).
I see "gpg: Oops: keyid_from_fingerprint: no pubkey" twice and an error about
key "" being more than once in trustdb along with a hint that MD5 sigs
are rejected wh
On 2015/03/18 20:11, Bob Henson wrote:
> I just installed the new GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 vanilla. I
> couldnot access the Enigmail key management window at all - getting the
> following error message:-
>
> error
> The spinner was indicating that it was trying to load the keys, but
> nothi
On 2015/03/18 02:15, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> I'm happy to announce the availability of Enigmail v1.8 for
> Thunderbird 31, and SeaMonkey 2.29 and newer.
Works fine with Thunderbird 37.0beta.
Thank you for hard work.
--
Kosuke Kaizuka
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I just installed the new GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 vanilla. I
couldnot access the Enigmail key management window at all - getting the
following error message:-
error
The spinner was indicating that it was trying to load the keys, but
nothing happenedafter a considerable wait.
I reinstalled
On 3/18/15 12:17 AM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
You can move all icons to the "upper" toolbar if you want to (using
the right mouse key -> Customize). The new toolbar is a regular
Thunderbird toolbar; you can freely move the icons between the two.
I am aware, but thank you for your response in a
On 3/17/15 11:46 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Um, since when? Hasn't the CW always been to have the user upload
their key to a key server?
Emphatically: no!
There are places in the world that will throw you in jail for using
crypto. People in these places tend to, and probably are correct to,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17.03.15 20:09, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Enigmail folks--
>
> Thanks for the enigmail v1.8 release, i hope to have it in debian
> experimental later today.
>
> I notice that the enigmail tagging scheme maps version 1.8 to
> enigmail-1-8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18.03.15 01:07, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> hi enigmail folks--
>
> I see that there are now test suites in the enigmail source!
Well yes, we have _very_ few of them; currently only to test the
concept. Details can be found here:
https://source
On 3/17/15 11:03 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Wed 2015-03-18 01:39:06 -0400, Doug Barton wrote:
I buy that argument, but it seems much more reasonable to me to make
sign and encrypt buttons that show up in the composition toolbar. This
would mean that we get the same usability improvement,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17.03.15 22:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> hi enigmail folks--
>
> after running "make" in 1.8, i see the contents below in
> unused.txt.
>
> Many of these do indeed seem to be unused. Would a series of
> patches that clean them up be welcome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18.03.15 06:39, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 3/17/15 8:00 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>
>>> On 18/03/15 12:43, Doug Barton wrote:
Were the buttons for encrypt and sign moved up to their own
toolbar instead of the old icons at the b
31 matches
Mail list logo
