Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Enigmail User
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 3/21/2015 11:44, Onno Ekker wrote: > On 21-3-2015 16:39, Enigmail User wrote: >> On 3/21/2015 06:36, Olav Seyfarth wrote: >>> Hi Patrick, >> I'm thinking about adding "--allow-weak-digest-algos" to the GnuPG parameters if GnuPG > 2.0.27

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Robert J. Hansen
> the point was: is it possible to further use a key that has/had MD5 and now > throws a warning by modifying it. If not, then the only way seems to be to > delete the key - if one doesn't want to /allow-weak-digest-algos/ . D'oh -- my bad. By "old key" I thought the poster meant, you know, an ol

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Olav Seyfarth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Robert, the point was: is it possible to further use a key that has/had MD5 and now throws a warning by modifying it. If not, then the only way seems to be to delete the key - if one doesn't want to /allow-weak-digest-algos/ . Olav - -- The Enigma

Re: [Enigmail] enigmail's new handbook - for 1.8 : smartcard reset

2015-03-21 Thread Philip Jackson
Hi Ludwig : On 21/03/15 16:26, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote: > We'll collect > feedback for a time and publish a corrected version afterwards. Another comment connected with smartcard usage. In the new handbook, next to last paragraph on page 98, it says : > The card is used to store the actual se

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Robert J. Hansen
> Is there any way in GPG to change the digest used with an older key? > I have a SHA-1 digest in a key that I use, and I'd like to make that > SHA-256 if possible. DSA-1024 requires a 160-bit hash, so if you're using that you're (somewhat) out of luck; even if you use SHA256, only 160 bits of it

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Onno Ekker
On 21-3-2015 16:39, Enigmail User wrote: > On 3/21/2015 06:36, Olav Seyfarth wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > >> I'm thinking about adding "--allow-weak-digest-algos" to the GnuPG > >> parameters if GnuPG > 2.0.27 is detected. Would you think this is > >> a good idea to get rid of the problem -- or this

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Enigmail User
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 3/21/2015 06:36, Olav Seyfarth wrote: > Hi Patrick, > >> I'm thinking about adding "--allow-weak-digest-algos" to the GnuPG >> parameters if GnuPG > 2.0.27 is detected. Would you think this is >> a good idea to get rid of the problem -- or this

Re: [Enigmail] enigmail's new handbook - for 1.8 : smartcard reset

2015-03-21 Thread Ludwig Hügelschäfer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Philip, On 19.03.15 22:16, Philip Jackson wrote: > The listing in the new handbook appears to be the "old > instructions" which WK says do not always work. Thanks for reporting! Is now corrected in my source. We'll collect feedback for a time a

Re: [Enigmail] (Bug) Enigmail notices illegible in some color schemes

2015-03-21 Thread Patrick Brunschwig
On 20.03.15 15:52, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > The signature verification/warning banner at the top of messages is > illegible when using a light-on-dark color scheme; see attached. > > Hard-coding the foreground color as well as the background color would > be an improvement, but please note that so

Re: [Enigmail] Error saving draft

2015-03-21 Thread Patrick Brunschwig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21.03.15 12:34, Onno Ekker wrote: > On 21-3-2015 12:26, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote: >> On 21.03.15 11:46, Onno Ekker wrote: >>> Hi, >> >>> After upgrading to Enigmail 1.8 I get an error on Windows 8.1 >>> Thunderbird 31.5.0 saying "Unable to save

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Bob Henson
On 21/03/2015 10:36 am, Olav Seyfarth wrote: > Hi Patrick, > >> I'm thinking about adding "--allow-weak-digest-algos" to the GnuPG >> parameters if GnuPG > 2.0.27 is detected. Would you think this is a good >> idea to get rid of the problem -- or this just postponing the problem? > > Please don'

Re: [Enigmail] Error saving draft

2015-03-21 Thread Onno Ekker
On 21-3-2015 12:26, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote: > On 21.03.15 11:46, Onno Ekker wrote: > > Hi, > > > After upgrading to Enigmail 1.8 I get an error on Windows 8.1 > > Thunderbird 31.5.0 saying "Unable to save your message as > > draft./Please verify that you Mail & Newsgroups account settings > > ar

Re: [Enigmail] Error saving draft

2015-03-21 Thread Ludwig Hügelschäfer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 21.03.15 11:46, Onno Ekker wrote: > Hi, > > After upgrading to Enigmail 1.8 I get an error on Windows 8.1 > Thunderbird 31.5.0 saying "Unable to save your message as > draft./Please verify that you Mail & Newsgroups account settings > are correc

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Bob Henson
On 21/03/2015 9:57 am, Olav Seyfarth wrote: > > Hi Bob, > > > Deletion was a shade more complex as two old Thawtes keys had private > keys, but all is now well. Thanks again, > > > So, how did you solve that? I also had two secret keys, now removed. > I'd like to restore them, but how to ged rid

Re: [Enigmail] Error saving draft

2015-03-21 Thread Crypto
Onno Ekker: > Hi, > > After upgrading to Enigmail 1.8 I get an error on Windows 8.1 > Thunderbird 31.5.0 saying "Unable to save your message as draft./Please > verify that you Mail & Newsgroups account settings are correct and try > again." > > In the Error Console I see the following messages: >

Re: [Enigmail] Error saving draft

2015-03-21 Thread Onno Ekker
On 21-3-2015 11:46, Onno Ekker wrote: > Hi, > > After upgrading to Enigmail 1.8 I get an error on Windows 8.1 > Thunderbird 31.5.0 saying "Unable to save your message as draft./Please > verify that you Mail & Newsgroups account settings are correct and try > again." > > In the Error Console I see t

[Enigmail] Error saving draft

2015-03-21 Thread Onno Ekker
Hi, After upgrading to Enigmail 1.8 I get an error on Windows 8.1 Thunderbird 31.5.0 saying "Unable to save your message as draft./Please verify that you Mail & Newsgroups account settings are correct and try again." In the Error Console I see the following messages: Error: Component is not avai

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Olav Seyfarth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Patrick, > I'm thinking about adding "--allow-weak-digest-algos" to the GnuPG > parameters if GnuPG > 2.0.27 is detected. Would you think this is a good > idea to get rid of the problem -- or this just postponing the problem? Please don't. MD5

[Enigmail] Configuring the color in Message Composition

2015-03-21 Thread Patrick Brunschwig
Some people told me that they don't like the red color of the message that is displayed when you write an unencrypted unsigned mail. I won't change the default, but there is a solution for this: All colors in Thunderbird are configurable by users. If you place the attached userChrome.css file into

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Patrick Brunschwig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21.03.15 10:57, Olav Seyfarth wrote: > Hi Bob, > >> Deletion was a shade more complex as two old Thawtes keys had >> private keys, but all is now well. Thanks again, > > So, how did you solve that? I also had two secret keys, now > removed. I'd

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Olav Seyfarth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Bob, > Deletion was a shade more complex as two old Thawtes keys had private > keys, but all is now well. Thanks again, So, how did you solve that? I also had two secret keys, now removed. I'd like to restore them, but how to ged rid of MD5 ther

Re: [Enigmail] New GnuPG 2.0.27

2015-03-21 Thread Bob Henson
On 20/03/2015 10:01 pm, Olav Seyfarth wrote: installed GnupG 2.0.27, via Gpg4Win 2.2.4 >>> reason is, that GnuPG 2.0.27 errors out if it detects keys using MD5. >>> Workaround: use allow-weak-digest-algos in Enigmail or gpg.conf >> Is there a method to search for such keys? > > I definitely