On 2018-02-12 21:00, Philip Jackson wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't make myself really clear.
> My concern was that I got the impression that the dummy message would
> always be equal to "Encrypted message" rather than to a random but
> sensible short message.
Is there a difference? The body is still
On 2/12/2018 8:11 AM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> On 12.02.18 13:52, David wrote:
>> On 2/12/2018 7:14 AM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
>>> I'm pleased to announce the 1st beta version of Enigmail 2.0. This marks
>>> a major milestone in the development of Enigmail. In the two years since
>>> the
On 12.02.18 13:52, David wrote:
> On 2/12/2018 7:14 AM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
>> I'm pleased to announce the 1st beta version of Enigmail 2.0. This marks
>> a major milestone in the development of Enigmail. In the two years since
>> the last major update, we improved and changed quite many
On 2/12/2018 7:14 AM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce the 1st beta version of Enigmail 2.0. This marks
> a major milestone in the development of Enigmail. In the two years since
> the last major update, we improved and changed quite many things. The
> code base grew by more
I'm pleased to announce the 1st beta version of Enigmail 2.0. This marks
a major milestone in the development of Enigmail. In the two years since
the last major update, we improved and changed quite many things. The
code base grew by more than 18%, and another 6% of the code was modified.
New
