Re: [E-devel] eet problem manifested in the entice/entrance build?

2004-05-31 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 28 May 2004 14:50:17 -0700 Alex Lovell-Troy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I'd like to start taking a look at the stuff that will become e17 and > tried to compile from cvs this afternoon 5-28-2004. The libs compil

Re: [E-devel] E 0.16.7 pre3

2004-05-31 Thread Kim Woelders
Michael Jennings wrote: On Monday, 31 May 2004, at 11:25:04 (+0200), Kim Woelders wrote: If there is a better way of doing things this might be a good time to sort it out so that it can be done right next time. For pre-releases, I like to use release numbers of 0.99.x, where x is the pre-release

Re: [E-devel] E 0.16.7 pre3

2004-05-31 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 31 May 2004, at 11:25:04 (+0200), Kim Woelders wrote: > If there is a better way of doing things this might be a good time > to sort it out so that it can be done right next time. For pre-releases, I like to use release numbers of 0.99.x, where x is the pre-release number. This keeps

Re: [E-devel] E 0.16.7 pre3

2004-05-31 Thread Kim Woelders
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 30 May 2004 06:32 pm, Kim Woelders wrote: Now available: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2 if you dont mind me asking, whats up with the extra version tag on the tarball ? why is enlightenment-0.16.7-pre1 named enlightenment-0.16.7-0.56.tar.gz