On 02/07/04, at 11:00 -0400, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, 02 July 2004, at 11:21:26 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > ooh yeah - when i run 2.13 explicitly (even tho the default autoconf
> > claims to be 2.13) it screws up.
>
> RedHat put some weird mojo in their
Here's my take, others comment as you see fit.
This is not a good time to re-invent the wheel. LW is a month off,
we're getting bits slowly into place with hopes to have a good
showing... overhaul of the website doesn't make sense right now.
Granted, if your gonna overhaul the site, do it befo
On Friday, 02 July 2004, at 11:21:26 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> ooh yeah - when i run 2.13 explicitly (even tho the default autoconf
> claims to be 2.13) it screws up.
RedHat put some weird mojo in their auto* stuff that used some weird
criteria to pick which version to actually run. App
Moritz Angermann wrote:
[Was: E-Org facelift - Now: eOrg RFC]
$ Moritz Angermann, v1, July 2nd 2004 $
what is this?
=
This is about a possible Redising and reorganisation of
the eOrg Webrepresentation.
The idea is to generate a better publicity.
And more people to use e/eOrg/eApps. Yes
[Was: E-Org facelift - Now: eOrg RFC]
$ Moritz Angermann, v1, July 2nd 2004 $
what is this?
=
This is about a possible Redising and reorganisation of
the eOrg Webrepresentation.
The idea is to generate a better publicity.
And more people to use e/eOrg/eApps. Yes this is about
PR. I'm
