On Friday 06 May 2005 11:40 pm, Emfox Zhou wrote:
> that's LGPL, not GPL.
still doesnt change the question ...
if e17 projects have been BSD, wouldnt code sharing between these projects be
invalid ... or do all e17 developers implicitly allow for other e17
developers to copy code from *GPL* e17
On Friday, 06 May 2005, at 09:49:26 (-0600),
Tres Melton wrote:
> Crap! I know I edited that patch file I just forgot where I put the
> edited one. Here is a fresh edit. Please ignore the last one.
Applied, thanks. :)
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAI
that's LGPL, not GPL.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma
I noticed that a GPL license was added to eclair today... I thought, in
general, that the E projects were not GPL. Is this a special case?
--
Kevin
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and giv
Hi Ibukun,
I've updated entrance this week and I look into configure.in.
There are 2 tests: one that is generic and clean :
AC_ARG_WITH(ecore,
[ --with-ecore=DIR use ecore in ],
[ CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -I$withval/include"
LIBS="-L$withval/lib $LIBS"])
And one that
Hi all,
I had some time on my hands the other day and wrote a sort routine into
the fileselector code in ewl. It's pretty dang fast, it uses qsort to
speed things up. The ls command also uses qsort, so it's just about as
fast as ls.
It does use a bit more memory but only while it's doing the sort
Crap! I know I edited that patch file I just forgot where I put the
edited one. Here is a fresh edit. Please ignore the last one.
Sorry :-/
--
Tres
--- Eterm-0.9.3-orig/src/pixmap.c 2004-07-22 14:12:31.0 -0600
+++ Eterm-0.9.3/src/pixmap.c 2005-05-06 08:30:20.0 -0600
@@ -1601,19
While hacking away on Eterm I noticed that when X is in 16 bpp mode and
Eterm is invoked with the option: --cmod 0x100 everything is great.
When cmod < 0x100 everything is good. When cmod > 0x100 the Eterm
window gets trashed.
Would someone please confirm this and if that happens to be the case
phriedrich wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2005 21:27:15 +0200
Massimo Maiurana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
however I found that I'm not able to go to another desktop if a window
is on the same edge I try to pass through.[...]
Same "feature" now in e16.8. Maybe its usefull if a application is is near
t
On Wed, 4 May 2005 21:27:15 +0200
Massimo Maiurana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
> however I found that I'm not able to go to another desktop if a window
> is on the same edge I try to pass through.[...]
Same "feature" now in e16.8. Maybe its usefull if a application is is near
the destops bo
Hi,
I am trying to hack the "new window gets the focus" feature into e17.
I tried to call e_border_focus_set() after e_border_show() in
_e_manager_cb_window_show_request. Here's the code:
bd = e_border_new(con, e->win, 0);
if (bd)
{
e_border_raise(bd);
e_border_show(bd);
e_border_fo
11 matches
Mail list logo