On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:17:51PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> done. in cvs. :)
Neato!
Thanks for fixing this, Geoff!
And thanks for your help, Carsten!
--Emil
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Fr
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:43:07 +1000 Daniel Kasak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> >you guys are seeing reds under every bed.
> >
> As a lowly user, I've been watching this thread, partly worried, and
> partly amused, but anyway keeping my nose out.
> But a
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>you guys are seeing reds under every bed.
>
As a lowly user, I've been watching this thread, partly worried, and
partly amused, but anyway keeping my nose out.
But as a socialist, I resent that comment.
'All Power to the Soviets!'
:)
Dan
--
I hesitate to add more to this thread but I feel compelled to; so here's
my two cents...
The time put into etk is paid by those that work on it; so if they felt
it was worth the time, then let them spend it. They don't HAVE to work
on the syndicated project. Introducing a competitor they way
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 19:25 +0100, Paulo Jorge de Oliveira Cantante de
Matos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shouldn't ewl_label receive always a const char * instead of a
> char * in its functions just like ewl_text does?
Done, thanks. I did ewl_button as well as there is no reason for it to
take a char * over
Sorry it took so long (marked to deal with then forgot). This is in cvs
now.
dan
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 01:44 +0200, Marcus aka }-Tux-{ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if you start emblem with command-line-option and you had a little typo
> you don't get an error message. I think it will be better to get one,
This should now be fixed (hopefully). Give cvs a try in a bit so anon
can sync and let me know if it still segvs.
dan
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 18:52 -0500, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
> That would make some sense as they were changed from standard widgets
> to a special attachment recently. I'll try to
Everyone here would do well to pay attention to what
Carsten has been trying to say on this issue -- he is being
very much the voice of reason and moderation.
If I may add my own thoughts on this..
All progress depends very much on having "excited newcomers",
some of thes
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:57:57 +1000 Geoffrey Giesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:53:02AM +1000, Geoffrey Giesemann wrote:
> > I've altered ximage.c to do this and it works:
> > http://yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au/~ggiesema/fixed.png
> >
> > (It's also a really really smal
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:57:57AM +1000, Geoffrey Giesemann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:53:02AM +1000, Geoffrey Giesemann wrote:
> > I've altered ximage.c to do this and it works:
> > http://yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au/~ggiesema/fixed.png
> >
> > (It's also a really really small patch)
> >
>
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:33:55 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Wednesday, 12 October 2005, at 01:10:14 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > i dont see anything working against - its in parallel and its in a
> > prototype dir. is he commiting bad code to ewl to make it w
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:53:02AM +1000, Geoffrey Giesemann wrote:
> I've altered ximage.c to do this and it works:
> http://yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au/~ggiesema/fixed.png
>
> (It's also a really really small patch)
>
Hurr, I can't write email early in the morning :(
It's:
http://yallara.cs.rmit.e
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:31:01PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:21:25 +1000 Emil Mikulic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:10:53PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > aah - but theres 2 bits of endianess handling to be done. 1 at the
> > > rg
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:24:57 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> (This is cross posted to e-web at the request of benr.)
Oops, should have mentioned, replies and follow ups set to e-web.
Probably a bad idea though.
pgpXMvYrz5xLt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Some of you might remember that once upon a time there was a discussion
list for Enlightenment.org called E-Web. Its still around, but has been
silent since mid-2003. I didn't realize untill today that part of the
reason it has been so dead is the fact that it was a private (and thus
hidden)
(This is cross posted to e-web at the request of benr.)
Yesterday on #edevelop there was a discussion on what to do with the
various web sites. So that we may discuss this and
reach a consensus, I am posting the log here as an attachment, trying to
inline it screws it up.
(I recently updated my
Do we not want ANALOG_STYLE_ENABLED too? =0 perhaps?
Bryan Taylor wrote:
Hi all,
I've created a patch that allows you to hide the analog clock while
still showing the digital clock. This work is just a small extension of
the patch in this thread:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.p
Hi there!
Attached is updated ru.po
Hope it will enter CVS soon ;)
Thanks,
Dan
E17 rulez forewa! ;)
# Russian translation of Enlightenment.
# This file is put in the public domain.
# Denis Klykvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2005.
# , fuzzy
#
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: Enlightenment
On Tuesday, 11 October 2005, at 12:29:43 (-0600),
Jason Smith wrote:
> I am not a developer so what I say may be misguided, but from what
> I've seen the only thing that's going to help this situation is for
> Hisham/Simon and Nathan/Dan to discuss the problem and come up with
> a solution.
The d
On Oct 11, 2005, at 11:33 AM, Michael Jennings wrote:Then stop trying to get in the middle. People have valid concerns that should be addressed. There are questions to which Nathan and Dan deserve answers that only Simon and Hisham can give. I respect that you're trying to play peacemaker, but i
On Wednesday, 12 October 2005, at 01:10:14 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> i dont see anything working against - its in parallel and its in a
> prototype dir. is he commiting bad code to ewl to make it worse? how
> is it working against?
Have you not noticed the frustration and anger it has ca
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:02:02 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tuesday, 11 October 2005, at 16:59:42 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > my quote for this mail:
> >
> > "can't we just all get along?"
>
> Some of us can. Those of us who are working as a team. Our pr
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 04:21 am, Emil Mikulic wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:10:53PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > try display form that ppc box onto your fbsd x86 box :)
>
> Sorry if the previous mail was vague, but we don't have a PPC here.
> Geoff said that PPC works on the basis o
On Tuesday, 11 October 2005, at 16:59:42 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> my quote for this mail:
>
> "can't we just all get along?"
Some of us can. Those of us who are working as a team. Our problem
is with those working *against* the team.
> ok everyone back off on the harsh language and
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:21:25 +1000 Emil Mikulic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:10:53PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > aah - but theres 2 bits of endianess handling to be done. 1 at the
> > rgbaimage level which is what that is fidldign with. the OTHER is at
> > the x
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:10:53 +1000 Emil Mikulic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 03:50:35PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > you're not going to like this:
> >
> > i don't know. those 2 visuals (16bpp fbsd, and 24bpp neoware) look slike
> > perfectly normal truecolor visua
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:51:49PM +1000, Geoffrey Giesemann wrote:
> > Geoff said that PPC works on the basis of Googling around. =)
>
> Not quite, I based it on a code comment in loader_png.c line 125
Sorry. I stand corrected.
> I have no idea if swapping the alpha channel around fixes anyth
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:50:16 -0500 Ibukun Olumuyiwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
my quote for this mail:
"can't we just all get along?"
ok everyone back off on the harsh language and mails. first. ETK is in PROTO...
i repeat - PROTO. PROTO PROTO PROTO
PROTO = PROTOTYPE
proto is a playground fo
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 06:21:25PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:10:53PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > aah - but theres 2 bits of endianess handling to be done. 1 at the
> > rgbaimage level which is what that is fidldign with. the OTHER is at
> > the ximage ouptut lev
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 05:10:53PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> aah - but theres 2 bits of endianess handling to be done. 1 at the
> rgbaimage level which is what that is fidldign with. the OTHER is at
> the ximage ouptut level.
That's what I thought. Problem at the X interface, not the image
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:34:30 -0700 Arlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> I ran into a bug with edje today. I'm using the latest libs (unless
> anon is behind).
> I asked a few people on Irc to try it, and one reproduced the crash with
> recent libs while someone else with an old version of edje (
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 03:50:35PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> you're not going to like this:
>
> i don't know. those 2 visuals (16bpp fbsd, and 24bpp neoware) look slike
> perfectly normal truecolor visuals - standard. the only thing that makes sense
> here is that maybe imlib2 is not bytesw
32 matches
Mail list logo
