On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:51:37 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 3. Are people willing to donate enough $ to make it happen?
>
I'm willing to donate! Just say how and when!
\\troback
--
Microsoft is not the answe
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
Apparently thinktux pulls some serious load and bandwidth - and that is not all
of the anonymous CVS access we have. Apparently Thinktux's machine is farily
overloaded CPU-wise and is pulling a good 25GB of CVS data traffic per day. I
imagine this will only
OK people
It seems CVS issues have been getting worse of late - SF.NET is being more
overloaded than ever, and thinktux needs to go down soon enough. We need to
solve this. Now This isn't edict, or guaranteed to happen, but it's an IDEA
open for discussion.
Apparently thinktux pulls some seri
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:30:07 +0100
CGA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24/01/06, Chady Kassouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I don't know about others, but I find that this operation is not
> > very useful.
> >
Agree, if I want a "clean" desktop I just switch to a new virtual
desktop!
>
patch for debianization tclock module
Index: configure.in
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/enlightenment/e_modules/tclock/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -r1.2 configure.in
191a192
> debian/changelog
debian.tar.gz
Description: B
On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 19:37:17 (-0800),
E CVS List wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : quan74
> Project : e17
> Module : libs/evas
>
> Dir : e17/libs/evas
>
>
> Modified Files:
> evas.spec.in
>
>
> Log Message:
> fixed arch problem in spec
Care to elabor
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:40:10 +0600 Vlad Alyukov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > "CH(R" == Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) writes:
>
> Hello, Carsten!
>
> /Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:36:55 +0900/ you wrote:
>
> >> >> how fix this?
> >>
> >> CH(R> check why in more detail. i486 is a bit s
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:40:00 +0800 James Hales
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi,
>
> There's a minor bug with edje_decc's output of "build.sh". When the .edj
> file has a special character in it, it fails to escape them when quoting
> the filename in the script, resulting in errors when the sc
Here are some patched files, against evolume-0.0.20, to build
evolume as an rpm, the SPEC is based on MEJ's excellent module
template spec :)
don't suppose we could convince you to submit evolume to cvs?
e_modules-evolume.spec.in
Description: Binary data
configure.ac
Description: Binary data
> "CH(R" == Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) writes:
Hello, Carsten!
/Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:36:55 +0900/ you wrote:
>> >> how fix this?
>>
>> CH(R> check why in more detail. i486 is a bit strange as most of the time
>> CH(R> archiotecture is reported as i686 (evas figures this out at
Hi,
There's a minor bug with edje_decc's output of "build.sh". When the .edj
file has a special character in it, it fails to escape them when quoting
the filename in the script, resulting in errors when the script is ran.
t's easily fixed manually by putting backslashes in front of the special
Looking thorugh the CVS tree as i was experementing with EFL i noticed
ETK which seemed to be an alternative widget set to EWL ( though i have
found no documentation on it) Then when trying to talor a EWL
application i noticed that it didn't have the nice themes that the E
config screens have so lo
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:06:04 -0500 Daniel Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> Looking thorugh the CVS tree as i was experementing with EFL i noticed
> ETK which seemed to be an alternative widget set to EWL ( though i have
> found no documentation on it) Then when trying to talor a EWL
> a
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:00:21 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 14:58:28 (-0600),
> Brian Mattern wrote:
>
> > The .eet loader should be all that's needed. The buffer engine isn't
> > even required for normal edje usage. (It is in some apps that
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:33:25 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 10:23:57 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > believe it or not - redhat is like the #3 most used OS for "embedded"
> > products
> > - yes.. redhat! fedora is #6 most popular - a
Looking thorugh the CVS tree as i was experementing with EFL i noticed
ETK which seemed to be an alternative widget set to EWL ( though i have
found no documentation on it) Then when trying to talor a EWL
application i noticed that it didn't have the nice themes that the E
config screens have so l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, phriedrich wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Eric Sandall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have enlightenment from 20060110 and no prior installation of
eloquence install
On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 14:58:28 (-0600),
Brian Mattern wrote:
> The .eet loader should be all that's needed. The buffer engine isn't
> even required for normal edje usage. (It is in some apps that do
> fancy things like make thumbnails of edjes).
And yet it doesn't make sense to build in
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 13:33, Michael Jennings wrote:
>
> But let me ask this: Once an .edc file has been turned into an .edj
> file, what modules are required at runtime to load the images in those
> files, if any? Is it enough to have those modules (esp.
> engine-buffer) at build time?
The
On 24/01/06, Chady Kassouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know about others, but I find that this operation is not very useful.
this your opinion and i respect it but
In
my daytime job, I work on windows, and since there are icons on the
desktop I use Window+D a lot to show the desktop in orde
On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 10:23:57 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> believe it or not - redhat is like the #3 most used OS for "embedded" products
> - yes.. redhat! fedora is #6 most popular - accor4ding to linuxdevices:
>
> http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4036830962.html
Among li
@@ -136,8 +135,8 @@
DENTER_FUNCTION(DLEVEL_STABLE);
DCHECK_PARAM_PTR("c", c);
DCHECK_PARAM_PTR("w", w);
- DCHECK_TYPE("c", c, EWL_CONTAINER_TYPE);
- DCHECK_TYPE("w", w, EWL_WIDGET_TYPE);
+ DCHECK_TYPE("c", c, "container");
+ DCHECK_TYPE("w", w, "widg
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:11:52 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> __ wrote:
> > that operation is quite useful, because you have a lot of modules,
> > which might be unreachable, because they are covered with windows.
>
> there is a simpler solution.. don
Виктор Кожухаров wrote:
that operation is quite useful, because you have a lot of modules, which
might be unreachable, because they are covered with windows.
there is a simpler solution.. don't fullscreen windows.. I nearly never
do.. (except on dedicated workspaces where I run stuff like moz
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:17:01 +0600 Vlad Alyukov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > "CH(R" == Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) writes:
>
> Hello, Carsten!
>
> /Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:45:43 +0900/ you wrote:
>
> CH (R> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:09:55 +0600 Vlad Alyukov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbl
that operation is quite useful, because you have a lot of modules, which
might be unreachable, because they are covered with windows.
and the idea is to iconify only the windows that are not iconified, so
after another ctrl+alt+d, only the windows that were iconified with this
method will be show
On 1/23/06, CGA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the action of this keybinding is to show/clean the desktop when you
have many applications' windows open if pressed once and to brign the
apps' windows back where they were if pressed again. I don't know about others, but I find that this operation is not
> "CH(R" == Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) writes:
Hello, Carsten!
/Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:45:43 +0900/ you wrote:
CH (R> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:09:55 +0600 Vlad Alyukov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
>>
>> how fix this?
CH(R> check why in more detail. i486 is a bit strange as most of
28 matches
Mail list logo
