Hi,
I'm still struggling a bit with the way e17 maximizes windows. I should say
that the current policies (e.g. "smart") make perfect sense the way they work,
what I'm missing is a possibility to define a "definitive" maximization that
always produces the same result for any window wherever it
Christopher Michael wrote:
> Виктор Кожухаров wrote:
>> В чт, 2007-02-01 в 01:29 +0100, Lut!n написа:
>>> Hello,
>>> I thought that having the hability to automagically hide the shelves
>>> would be nice.
>>> Here are some patches for E and its defaut theme that enable a per-shelf
>>> auto-hide o
>
> Just for the record... is this auto-hide stuff going into CVS any time soon?
> In principle it would be a good thing IMHO.
>
> Nick.
>
>
that is all up to raster who iirc is still on vactation, and more than
likely will have a more than slightly full inbox upon his return.
--
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 05:53:12 -0500 boneyfrog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just for the record... is this auto-hide stuff going into CVS any
> > time soon? In principle it would be a good thing IMHO.
>
> that is all up to raster who iirc is still on vactation, and more than
> likely will have a m
On 06/02/07, Nikolas Arend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still struggling a bit with the way e17 maximizes windows. I should say
> that the current policies (e.g. "smart") make perfect sense the way they
> work, what I'm missing is a possibility to define a "definitive" maximization
>
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 21:15:21 +0900 "David Stevenson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) make the maximization algorithm configurable so you can make it do
> whichever way you prefer.
I've always wanted this, so that I can have a fullscreen that behaves
the way I want it to, rather than having to sele
On Tuesday, 06 February 2007, at 21:15:50 (+1000),
David Seikel wrote:
> but I'm sure he is still on Coogee Beach somewhere enjoying himself
> way too much. B-)
Only if Coogee Beach is in London. Or did you miss the part where he
left the country a week ago?
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:40:38 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 06 February 2007, at 21:15:50 (+1000),
> David Seikel wrote:
>
> > but I'm sure he is still on Coogee Beach somewhere enjoying himself
> > way too much. B-)
>
> Only if Coogee Beach is in London. Or did
