Greetings all.
As some of you might have noticed on IRC (and alot of you have helped
me) that I am making some Embryo examples of some common and
interesting functions for use in various edje themes. Im running into
alot of trouble since there is infact, NO documentation on embryo.
Sure there is th
Gustavo wrote:
>> It's definitely useful to have such a ready-made simplifying
>> smart-class construction mechanism that could be 'overriden' - and
>> if you could couple that with some kind of object system for smart
>> data it might even be close to some aspects that the gui toolkits
>>
On Tue, 20 May 2008 21:19:43 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:18 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 May 2008 18:27:32 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >
> > then
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:18 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008 18:27:32 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> then u'd have a platform that does NOT do 2's compliment math. not compiler
> but
> cpu... and i'd love to s
On Tue, 20 May 2008 18:27:32 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
then u'd have a platform that does NOT do 2's compliment math. not compiler but
cpu... and i'd love to see that exist - NOT. :) everything is 2's compliment
and so a 1 bit signed bitfield when "on" is "-1" w
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Kim Woelders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>
>> to make clear: it COULD be -0, on intel at least it's -1 and thus
>> evaluates to TRUE, that's why it was unnoticed.
>>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Enlightenment CVS
>> <[EMAIL P
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> to make clear: it COULD be -0, on intel at least it's -1 and thus
> evaluates to TRUE, that's why it was unnoticed.
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Enlightenment CVS
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Enlightenment CVS committal
>>
>> Author : barbieri
>> Proje
to make clear: it COULD be -0, on intel at least it's -1 and thus
evaluates to TRUE, that's why it was unnoticed.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Enlightenment CVS
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : barbieri
> Project : e17
> Module : libs/evas
>
> Dir : e
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Anyone else looked at this? May I add the clipped smart object (no
layout stuff!) to evas? I can add some docs and even change basic
smart object to refer to this one for simple implementations.
>>>
>>> Anyone else looked at this? May I add the clipped smart object (no
>>> layout stuff!) to evas? I can add some docs and even change basic
>>> smart object to refer to this one for simple implementations.
>>>
>>>
>> For those who are irc challenged, maybe you could give a short
>> ov
Diego wrote:
> We decided to improve the line implementation to speed up the use of
> evas-lines in python (our case). Yes, we could just use polygons, but we are
> trying to reduce processor usage at this point.
> Its faster to draw lines (with lines implementation) directly, specially
> deali
Build log for Enlightenment DR 0.17 on 2008-05-20 07:10:27 -0700
Build logs are available at http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs
Packages that failed to build:
enna http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/enna.log
epdf http://download.enlightenment.org/tests/logs/epdf.log
evolve h
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) schrieb:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:26:37 +0200 Peter Wehrfritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> it should work now in cvs :)
>
Yup, it works for me, too. Thanks :)
-
This SF.net email is sp
This patches I sent last mail are the last working, sorry, I forgot to tell.
They are with two corrections we've got here in testing.
Diego
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visu
We decided to improve the line implementation to speed up the use of
evas-lines in python (our case). Yes, we could just use polygons, but we are
trying to reduce processor usage at this point.
Its faster to draw lines (with lines implementation) directly, specially
dealing with vertical/horizontal
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gustavo wrote:
>
>> Anyone else looked at this? May I add the clipped smart object (no
>> layout stuff!) to evas? I can add some docs and even change basic
>> smart object to refer to this one for simple implementations.
16 matches
Mail list logo