I did a little leg work to see what the Gnome and KDE folks are doing.
http://foundation.gnome.org/legal/
http://foundation.gnome.org/finance/
(Yes, the 2007 books are not available! Naughty Naughty!)
Looks like they run the show themselves, but get free-ish legal
services from SFLC
http://ev.kde
Hello,
[Not a development topic.. but I need to hit the right audience]
Last year, with our acceptance in GSoC, it came to my attention that we
might possibly benefit from forming an official 501(c)(3) Non Profit
Organization. This has become fresh in my mind again this year due to
GSoC, but als
2009/2/7 Luca De Marini :
> 2009/2/6 Jorge Mariani
>
>> Have you tried http://www.rentacoder.com/RentACoder/DotNet/default.aspx
>>
>
> That's exactly the place I was going to use from the beginning :)
I get the feeling it would be better paying someone within the project
already as they might kno
2009/2/6 Jorge Mariani
> Have you tried http://www.rentacoder.com/RentACoder/DotNet/default.aspx
>
That's exactly the place I was going to use from the beginning :)
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the bro
Have you tried http://www.rentacoder.com/RentACoder/DotNet/default.aspx
On Feb 6, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Luca De Marini wrote:
>>
>> I think you're looking for an individual developer, willing to get
>> code done and hopefully the guy continue working on the project (same
>> aim as GSoC). But if you c
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Luca De Marini
wrote:
>
>>
>> I think you're looking for an individual developer, willing to get
>> code done and hopefully the guy continue working on the project (same
>> aim as GSoC). But if you cannot find any and want to contract a
>> company, ProFUSION can do
>
> I think you're looking for an individual developer, willing to get
> code done and hopefully the guy continue working on the project (same
> aim as GSoC). But if you cannot find any and want to contract a
> company, ProFUSION can do such work. Our employees (myself included)
> are doing some mi
On Friday, 06 February 2009, at 16:40:28 (-0200),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Sorry! I was trying to give the sense that all applications would
> get this priority. Maybe have a textblock explaining why it is
> useful?
Perhaps a different verbiage altogether would be more clear? "Child
Pro
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Friday, 06 February 2009, at 14:35:21 (-0200),
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> I'd make "Application Priority" plural, like "Applications Priority".
>
> That would be grammatically incorrect.
Sorry! I was trying to give the sense
On Friday, 06 February 2009, at 14:35:21 (-0200),
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> I'd make "Application Priority" plural, like "Applications Priority".
That would be grammatically incorrect.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/
Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.g
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:50 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:37:35 +0100 Viktor Kojouharov
> said:
>
>> Continuing from the previous discussion on this topic, someone suggested
>> that the nice level for app execution should be configurable.
>>
>> I've attached a
-- Forwarded message --
From: hannes.janet...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [E-devel] Stipended code donation
To: Luca De Marini
Hi Luca,
you won the jackpot?!
This is not a direct reply to your request, but as you brought up the
topic: I think a bit
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Luca De Marini
wrote:
> Hallo everyone, with my own money, I'm going to stipend a coder to work
> hardly on the Enlightenment FM. I thought this is something good to do and
> very similar to what google does in the summer of code afterall. So, now,
> the only thing
Hallo everyone, with my own money, I'm going to stipend a coder to work
hardly on the Enlightenment FM. I thought this is something good to do and
very similar to what google does in the summer of code afterall. So, now,
the only thing to define is what the coder should implement. What's missing,
w
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:37:35 +0100 Viktor Kojouharov
said:
> Continuing from the previous discussion on this topic, someone suggested
> that the nice level for app execution should be configurable.
>
> I've attached a patch that does this, so if there are no complaints,
> I'll commit it soon.
s
15 matches
Mail list logo
