Re: [E-devel] E SVN: urandom IN trunk/PROTO/image-viewer: . data/theme src/bin

2009-04-16 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Viktor Kojouharov wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 18:16 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Enlightenment SVN >> wrote: >> > Log: >> >  create the thumbnails in a different thread >> >> noo ethumb uses efl, and tha

[E-devel] ATTENTION: svn feature freeze this weekend (April 17-19)

2009-04-16 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Hello everyone, >From now on we should not commit any feature to Enlightenment or its dependencies so we can try to make it more stable to be package on Monday. === USERS and DEVELOPERS === Please remove all installed libraries and compile everything again to be sure everything is working fine on

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: urandom IN trunk/PROTO/image-viewer: . data/theme src/bin

2009-04-16 Thread Viktor Kojouharov
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 18:16 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Enlightenment SVN > wrote: > > Log: > > create the thumbnails in a different thread > > noo ethumb uses efl, and that cannot be used from > different threads... > > we're working on

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: urandom IN trunk/PROTO/image-viewer: . data/theme src/bin

2009-04-16 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: >  create the thumbnails in a different thread noo ethumb uses efl, and that cannot be used from different threads... we're working on ethumb client/server to solve these things, stay tunned... until then just avoid doi

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-16 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:25 PM, sda wrote: >> hi, >> >> just FYI - general rules for rpm packaging: >> http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html >> brief summary of packaging conventions which confirms to the LSB could >> be revie

[E-devel] [PATCH] Exclude debian/.cvsignore from python source packages

2009-04-16 Thread Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
Hi all, Attached, a small patch to MANIFEST.in files python bindings to remove debian directory and .cvsignore from source code packages generated with $python setup.py sdist. IMHO, source packages should not include any information relative to a specific distro. Best regards, Etrunko. -- Eduar

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-16 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:25 PM, sda wrote: > hi, > > just FYI - general rules for rpm packaging: > http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html > brief summary of packaging conventions which confirms to the LSB could > be reviewed below (distro-specific!): > http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging

Re: [E-devel] [PATH] add build theme option in configure.in

2009-04-16 Thread Lars Munch
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 03:07:20PM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:11:46 +0100 Nicolas Aguirre > said: > > > Hi, > > This patch add an option in configure to enable/disable theme build. It's > > usefull when you cross compile elementary and your host doesn't have > > edje_

Re: [E-devel] An ecore based libpurple client...

2009-04-16 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Agree On 4/16/09, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:17 AM, "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)" > wrote: >> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM, "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)" >>> wrote: Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:16 PM, "

Re: [E-devel] about package files

2009-04-16 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:11:00 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri said: On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:41:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri said: hey, just a thought: as i plan to pu

Re: [E-devel] about package files

2009-04-16 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:11:00 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri said: > > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:41:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri > > said: > > > >> > >> hey, > >> > >> just a thought: as i plan to put NSIS scripts for windows efl u

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-16 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > in that case, is it good to specify both -release and -version-info in > _LDFLAGS ? > I think it's mostly a matter of taste. Keeping both doesn't hurt much IMHO, and all you'll have to do when there's a real release is remove the '-releas

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-16 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Albin Tonnerre wrote: >> >>> Patch attached. As usual, comments are welcome >> >> in ecore, is it really necessary to have a release-info for each module ? >> > > I t

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Proposal] release schedule and version numbering

2009-04-16 Thread Albin Tonnerre
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > >> Patch attached. As usual, comments are welcome > > in ecore, is it really necessary to have a release-info for each module ? > I think it's better, unless you want to force a SONAME change

Re: [E-devel] An ecore based libpurple client...

2009-04-16 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:17 AM, "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)" wrote: > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM, "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)" >> wrote: >>> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:16 PM, "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)" wrote: > You

Re: [E-devel] about package files

2009-04-16 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:41:32 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri said: hey, just a thought: as i plan to put NSIS scripts for windows efl users (i know that they are numerous :p), i think that, maybe, we should put the current package fi