On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 23:40, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:19 AM, daniele_athome
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:46, daniele_athome
>> wrote:
>>> The modified line is the last one, was "return cbt[0]"
>>> Merry christams to everybody
>>
>> There is anothe
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:19 AM, daniele_athome
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:46, daniele_athome
> wrote:
>> The modified line is the last one, was "return cbt[0]"
>> Merry christams to everybody
>
> There is another problem. data_get() on ListItem doesn't return the
> correct data. Retur
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 7:46 AM, daniele_athome
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:37, daniele_athome
> wrote:
>> As you can see, ListItem IS in the tuple, but the object passed to the
>> actual python callback is cbt[0], so the List. Anyway I'll make some
>> other tests in the meanwhile.
>>
>
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:46, daniele_athome wrote:
> The modified line is the last one, was "return cbt[0]"
> Merry christams to everybody
There is another problem. data_get() on ListItem doesn't return the
correct data. Returned data is ( ( ), { } ).
--
daniele_athome
--
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:16 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
>
>
>> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Brett Nash wrote:
>
>
> Also, doing sizeof() is a compiler directive so does not incur any
> performance hits...plus it matches the rest of EFL.
>
using a
Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:16 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
>
>
>
>> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Brett Nash wrote:
>>
>
>
>
> Also, doing sizeof() is a compiler directive so does not incur any
> performance hits...plus it matches the rest of EFL.
>
>
>
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:16 +0100, Vincent Torri wrote :
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Brett Nash wrote:
> >>> Also, doing sizeof() is a compiler directive so does not incur any
> >>> performance hits...plus it matches the rest of EFL.
> >> using a macro does not involved any performance hit too as PAT
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Brett Nash wrote:
>
>>> Also, doing sizeof() is a compiler directive so does not incur any
>>> performance hits...plus it matches the rest of EFL.
>>
>> using a macro does not involved any performance hit too as PATH_MAX
>> is directly replaced by its value before the compil
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:37, daniele_athome wrote:
> As you can see, ListItem IS in the tuple, but the object passed to the
> actual python callback is cbt[0], so the List. Anyway I'll make some
> other tests in the meanwhile.
>
It seems that returning cbt[2] solves the problem; but I want
Gust
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 02:08, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> You mean, after my patch? Take a look _list_item_conv.
>
I printed variable cbt in _list_item_conv callback, this is the
content of the tuple:
(
List(0x40f23990, type='elm_widget', refcount=10, Evas_Object=0x180e20,
name=None, geom
10 matches
Mail list logo