On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:29:23 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN"
said:
hmmm shouldnt we make it:
PREFIX/lib/edje/modules/MODULENAME/arch-ver-string/module.so
to be consistent? :) (basically it allows multiple so's, binaries etc. to be
part of a module too as well as to ship data files that are not arch/v
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:27:51 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN"
said:
actually it needs to stay in. the source of this is the fact EDBus.h includes
dbus/dbus.h which means apps (or libs that use edbus) can use libdbus calls
directly as a result and thus require direct linking. get rid of that include
and
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:24:51 +0200 Andreas Volz said:
in e - no. in elementary... yes :) wait for e18.
> Hello,
>
> I'm just changing a E module and search a solution to change attributes
> of a label added with e_widget_label_add(). In this case bold/color. Is
> there any way to do so?
>
> re
On Tuesday, 17 August 2010, at 07:53:22 (+0100),
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> > His opinion of that BSD license, like any other, is the same: it
> > is not Good and Right because it fails to guarantee the freedoms
> > of software recipients.
>
> An important consideration to make in such sta
Hey guys,
there is a problem with using the conf_display dialog.
This patches fixes it.
The rest of the patch workarounds a problem with 'reset'-events sent,
when the client supports RandR >=1.2, but uses RandR 1.1 API (e.g.
command line tool xrandr -s ...).
BR,
Leif
diff --git a/e/src/bin/e_ra
Hello,
I'm just changing a E module and search a solution to change attributes
of a label added with e_widget_label_add(). In this case bold/color. Is
there any way to do so?
regards
Andreas
--
This SF.net email
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 18:13 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
>> To be consistent with the other EFL, we would move all the content of
>> src/include in src/lib. I'm not against that.
>
> Exactly what I said in IRC :)
> If we decide to do that, we ne
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 18:13 +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
> To be consistent with the other EFL, we would move all the content of
> src/include in src/lib. I'm not against that.
Exactly what I said in IRC :)
If we decide to do that, we need to do it before the release.
Actually, I think it's bette
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have heard today that in Eina, all the .h's and .x's should be located
> in the "src/include" dir, even if they are *not* shipped.
>
> That's ugly, stupid and confusing.
>
> There's no reason why to put headers or include files that should
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Rafael Antognolli
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Brian Wang
>> wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> Is there any offical "powered by EFL" logo available for use on a
>>> website/project wiki/device?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Rafael Antognolli
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Brian Wang wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> Is there any offical "powered by EFL" logo available for use on a
>> website/project wiki/device?
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> This is not an "official" one, but if everyone el
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:09 AM, Brian Wang wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Is there any offical "powered by EFL" logo available for use on a
> website/project wiki/device?
Hi Brian,
This is not an "official" one, but if everyone else approves, it could
be. Feel free to use it:
http://imgur.com/77lbj
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:58:36 +0200 Andreas Volz said:
> Hello Carsten,
>
> I've one special wish. Could you include and install a enlightenment
> dbus start script in the official distribution?
>
> > vi enlightenment_start_dbus
> --
> #!/bin/sh
>
> dbus-launch --exi
Hey all,
I have heard today that in Eina, all the .h's and .x's should be located
in the "src/include" dir, even if they are *not* shipped.
That's ugly, stupid and confusing.
There's no reason why to put headers or include files that should not be
shipped in that directory for the following reas
Em 16-08-2010 23:03, Michael Jennings escreveu:
> On Monday, 16 August 2010, at 09:41:37 (-0300),
> Andres Blanc wrote:
>
>> Edje's COPYING file[1] is quite similar to the Vorbis BSD-Like
>> license[2] which was endorsed by Stallman[3] itself.
>
> I think you misunderstood. Stallman wasn't endor
Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:59:47 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The
Rasterman):
> ok. i've moved all of the target libs forward for 1.0.0 alpha in svn.
> everything should build now that is in the release set (and then some
> - i fixed e17 and a chunk of other things).
>
> what would be good is that
16 matches
Mail list logo
