Re: [E-devel] E SVN: lucas trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-09-09 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: >  Fix priority dropping > >  Lowering priority was wrong. Some bugs: > >  1) You don't lower the priority by setting the scheduler policy to some >     of the real-time ones (SCHED_RR or SCHER_FIFO). If you do so, you are >     actua

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: lucas trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-09-09 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > This logic start to be really complex and sounds not really portable, > I would advocate to move it in eina as eina_thread_priority_drop(void) As long as it remains correct I don't bother where to put this function. > and replace evas code als

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: lucas trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-09-09 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> This logic start to be really complex and sounds not really portable, >> I would advocate to move it in eina as eina_thread_priority_drop(void) > > As long as it remains correct I don't bother whe

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: lucas trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-09-09 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> >>> This logic start to be really complex and sounds not really portable, >>> I would advocate to move it in eina as eina_thread_priority_dro

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: lucas trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-09-09 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> somewhere where i can port the code only once on Windows (using native win32 >> threads) > > Agreed, so move it to eina please. But.. we are in a frozen state, aren't we? Lucas De Marchi ---

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: lucas trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-09-09 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> somewhere where i can port the code only once on Windows (using native win32 >>> threads) >> >> Agreed, so move it to eina please. > > But.. we are in a frozen state, aren't we? >

Re: [E-devel] fixing typos

2010-09-09 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Sep 9, 2010 2:54 AM, "Brett Nash" wrote: >> package-name-doesnt-match-soname->package-name-doesn't-match-soname >> package-name-doesnt-match-sonames->package-name-doesn't-match-sonames > > That smells more like some sort of symbol rather than a typo. > Yes, I know. For the patches I applied I

[E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Hi all, After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd like to ask you developers to improve commits and particularly their messages. 1 - The most complained annoyance is by far commits that break SVN, making it unreliable for users... and if you recall we don't have releases

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread Leandro Pereira
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > 4 - The fourth annoyance is related to the previous and is could be > called "commit torrent" or "ssh over svn" or "gcc over svn" and is the > result of people committing every line or test they do, then > committing couple of chang

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd > like to ask you developers to improve commits and particularly their > messages. > > 1 - The most complained annoyance is by far commits that break SVN, > making

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread Leif Middelschulte
Hey guys, with regards to the commit message part: I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a commit message and make the server reject commits if necessary. Am 09.09.2010 um 18:22 schrieb Leandro Pereira: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > wrote: >> 4 -

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread Vincent Torri
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > Hi all, > > After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd > like to ask you developers to improve commits and particularly their > messages. > > 1 - The most complained annoyance is by far commits that break SVN, > makin

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte wrote: > Hey guys, > > with regards to the commit message part: > I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a commit message and > make the server reject commits if necessary. > > Am 09.09.2010 um 18:22 schrieb Leandro Pereira: >> On

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread Leif Middelschulte
Am 09.09.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Cedric BAIL: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte > wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> with regards to the commit message part: >> I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a commit message and >> make the server reject commits if necessary. >

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > As we're approaching a release, I'd like to ask you all, including > Raster, to try to be kind and improve over these topics. > > Comments? Suggestions? > I agree with all the points Barbieri raised. It's much easier to follow th

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Leif Middelschulte wrote: > > Am 09.09.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Cedric BAIL: > >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte >> wrote: >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> with regards to the commit message part: >>> I think it might be an idea to formalize the header of a c

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread Eduardo Felipe
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Leif Middelschulte > wrote: >> >> Am 09.09.2010 um 18:41 schrieb Cedric BAIL: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Leif Middelschulte >>> wrote: Hey guys, with regards to the commit

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:35:46 +0200 Cedric BAIL said: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > wrote: > > After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd > > like to ask you developers to improve commits and particularly their > > messages. > > > > 1 - The m

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:01:46 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > >>> As you know, a couple of weeks ago, I had a little poll [0] around. > > As some already mentioned, I need to extend this poll by another one e.g. > > "Which VCS would you like to use with EFL?". Still the outcomes of this > >

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:59:42 -0300 Eduardo Felipe said: > My company uses git-svn, with a "curated" version of EFL, internally. > We cherry-pick fixes and only get in sync with svn HEAD on > snapshots/releases. There's been a lot of discussion internally if we > should publish our repository on gi

Re: [E-devel] Improving commits and their messages

2010-09-09 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:35:46 +0200 Cedric BAIL said: > >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri >> wrote: >> > After lots of people complaining to me at IRC, mail and others, I'd >> > like to ask you developers to improv

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: barbieri trunk/TMP/st/elementary/src/lib

2010-09-09 Thread Brett Nash
I'm sort of changing the stuff in elm_photo with a number of FIXMEs and hard coded numbers linking in cnp too. Maybe -Wno-unused-parameter? Regards, nash On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:39 -0700, "Enlightenment SVN" wrote: > Log: > some -Wall -Wextra warning cleanups. > > elm_cnp_helper

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: morlenxus trunk/E-MODULES-EXTRA/wlan/src

2010-09-09 Thread Fabiano Fidêncio
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: >  fix recent menu api break Still broken here! SEGV when click with mouse's right button. At least for iBar, iBox, mixer. econnman, temperature, cpu, places ... Can anyone confirm? > Author:       morlenxus > Date:         2010-0

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: morlenxus trunk/E-MODULES-EXTRA/wlan/src

2010-09-09 Thread Christopher Michael
On 09/09/2010 10:32 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Enlightenment SVN > wrote: >> Log: >> fix recent menu api break > > Still broken here! > SEGV when click with mouse's right button. > At least for iBar, iBox, mixer. econnman, temperature, cpu, places ... > > Can

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: morlenxus trunk/E-MODULES-EXTRA/wlan/src

2010-09-09 Thread Brett Nash
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:32 -0300, "Fabiano Fidêncio" wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Enlightenment SVN > wrote: > > Log: > >  fix recent menu api break > > Still broken here! > SEGV when click with mouse's right button. > At least for iBar, iBox, mixer. econnman, temperature, cpu, place