Hello.
I re-attached elm_genlist multi-touch smart callbacks patch.
"multi,swipe,left" - This is called when the genlist is multi-touch swiped
left.
"multi,swipe,right" - This is called when the genlist is multi-touch swiped
right.
"multi,swipe,up" - This is called when the genlist is multi-touch
All three of them are here :)
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 09:43 +0900, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Hello,
> My previous two patch emails are missing :(
> This is just for a test.
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
> Learn how Oracle Real Appli
On 01/02/2011 11:33 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> why did you turn off config versioning devilhorns? back on!
>
Was not me. I haven't touched e_config.c in about 5 months. Let me
guess, you used svn blame and it came up with my name ? WTH is going on
w/ that command ? This is the second t
Pants on fire.
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 10:59 -0500, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 01/02/2011 11:33 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> > Log:
> > why did you turn off config versioning devilhorns? back on!
> >
> Was not me. I haven't touched e_config.c in about 5 months. Let me
> guess, you used svn b
Hmm, well I'll be. As it turns out, apparently I did :( some 16 months
ago ... don't even remember doing thatbut trac doesn't lie:
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/42152/trunk/e/src/bin/e_config.c
I think that may have been something that got committed by accident as I
can see no v
I always knew "pants on fire" is a good argument, but I could have never
imagined how much. :P
--
Tom.
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 11:20 -0500, Christopher Michael wrote:
> Hmm, well I'll be. As it turns out, apparently I did :( some 16 months
> ago ... don't even remember doing thatbut trac doesn
LOL, well when more than one person blames you for something, you tend
to want to seek out the truth, thus my venture into Trac to find where
that line was changedand to my incredible surprise, it turns out it
actually was me :( Not sure why that change was made (as it was a long
time ago),
Trac is obviously lying. raster probably installed the April fools' Trac
plugin.
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 11:30 -0500, Christopher Michael wrote:
> LOL, well when more than one person blames you for something, you tend
> to want to seek out the truth, thus my venture into Trac to find where
> that
No, Trac is not lying in this case...tho I wish it was ;)
dh
On 01/03/2011 11:38 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Trac is obviously lying. raster probably installed the April fools' Trac
> plugin.
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 11:30 -0500, Christopher Michael wrote:
>> LOL, well when more than one person bla
It can be arranged.
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 11:43 -0500, Christopher Michael wrote:
> No, Trac is not lying in this case...tho I wish it was ;)
>
> dh
--
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows cu
Haha interesting!
It looks like everything came back as usual after Raster returned :)
2011. 1. 3. 오전 8:24에 "Tom Hacohen" 님이 작성:
> All three of them are here :)
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 09:43 +0900, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>> Hello,
>> My previous two patch emails are missing :(
>> This is just f
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:45:37 +0200 Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> It can be arranged.
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 11:43 -0500, Christopher Michael wrote:
> > No, Trac is not lying in this case...tho I wish it was ;)
/me snickers.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:59:26 -0500 Christopher Michael
said:
> On 01/02/2011 11:33 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> > Log:
> > why did you turn off config versioning devilhorns? back on!
> >
> Was not me. I haven't touched e_config.c in about 5 months. Let me
> guess, you used svn blame and it cam
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:20:57 -0500 Christopher Michael
said:
blame! :)
> Hmm, well I'll be. As it turns out, apparently I did :( some 16 months
> ago ... don't even remember doing thatbut trac doesn't lie:
>
> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/42152/trunk/e/src/bin/e_config.c
>
>
Indeed. Guilty as charged :( What's the 'sentence' for this offense ? ;)
dh
On 01/03/2011 11:43 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:20:57 -0500 Christopher Michael
> said:
>
> blame! :)
>
>> Hmm, well I'll be. As it turns out, apparently I did :( some 16 months
>>
On 01/03/2011 11:48 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:45:37 +0200 Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
>
>> It can be arranged.
>>
>> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 11:43 -0500, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>> No, Trac is not lying in this case...tho I wish it was ;)
>
> /me snickers.
>
What are you snicke
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:55:10 -0500 Christopher Michael
wrote:
> Indeed. Guilty as charged :( What's the 'sentence' for this
> offense ? ;)
>
> On 01/03/2011 11:43 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:20:57 -0500 Christopher
> > Michael said:
> >
> > blame! :)
>
On 01/03/2011 11:58 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:55:10 -0500 Christopher Michael
> wrote:
>
>> Indeed. Guilty as charged :( What's the 'sentence' for this
>> offense ? ;)
>>
>> On 01/03/2011 11:43 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:20:57 -05
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:05:55 -0500 Christopher Michael
wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 11:58 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:55:10 -0500 Christopher Michael
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Indeed. Guilty as charged :( What's the 'sentence' for this
> >> offense ? ;)
> >>
> >> On 01/03/2011 11:43
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 03:09:52 +1000 David Seikel said:
> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:05:55 -0500 Christopher Michael
> wrote:
>
> > On 01/03/2011 11:58 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> > > On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:55:10 -0500 Christopher Michael
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Indeed. Guilty as charged :( What's t
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 03:09:52 +1000 David Seikel said:
>
>> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:05:55 -0500 Christopher Michael
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/03/2011 11:58 AM, David Seikel wrote:
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:55:10 -0500 Christopher Michae
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 18:42:35 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 03:09:52 +1000 David Seikel said:
> >
> >> On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:05:55 -0500 Christopher Michael
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 01/03/2011 11:58
On 01/03/2011 12:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 18:42:35 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
> said:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 03:09:52 +1000 David Seikel said:
>>>
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:05:55 -
Hello,
I wrote an initial edj with an editor and then later started to edit
it with edje_editor. For some time now I use editje to edit my edj. But
for some unknown reasons the program block isn't available or I don't
understand the new concept.
But it's still in the edj, because it's working and
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 00:14:52 +0100 Andreas Volz said:
you don't need the signal: ""; and source: ""; you know if all you want is
"non-triggered" programs (ie they dont get triggered by a signal/source byt get
explicitly run by name only as you do) :) makes your edc shorter :)
> Hello,
>
> I wrot
Iván did the work to support programs in Editje, it was not supported
until the last commits of Editje and Edje_Edit (inside edje library).
Maybe you need a new version and start it from scratch? I'm sure Iván
(Sachiel) tested it, but if you report some way to reproduce he can
try to fix it.
On Mo
26 matches
Mail list logo
