On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Rafael Antognolli
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Chris Michael wrote:
>> Also, you could use ecore_wl_registry_get instead of
>> wl_display_get_registry.
>>
>> And ecore_wl_display_iterate instead of wl_display_dispatch.
>>
>> dh
>
> Notice that the wl
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Chris Michael wrote:
> Also, you could use ecore_wl_registry_get instead of
> wl_display_get_registry.
>
> And ecore_wl_display_iterate instead of wl_display_dispatch.
>
> dh
Notice that the wl_display_dispatch (and consequently,
ecore_wl_display_iterate) may also
Hi!
Thanks for the quick review.
I will find a better solution for the im_module_init and fix the formatting.
Jan Arne
On 04/19/2013 11:56 AM, Chris Michael wrote:
> Also, you could use ecore_wl_registry_get instead of
> wl_display_get_registry.
>
> And ecore_wl_display_iterate instead of wl_
Well, if there's no immediate possibility of configurability, I vote for
CTRL+1,2,3..9,0
for me, those are the least likely to clash.
best,
Ray
2013/4/18 Carsten Haitzler
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:50:29 +0200 Boris Faure said:
>
> > On 13-04-18 14:20, Gustavo Lima Chaves wrote:
> > > * Carste
Also, you could use ecore_wl_registry_get instead of
wl_display_get_registry.
And ecore_wl_display_iterate instead of wl_display_dispatch.
dh
On 19/04/13 10:53, Chris Michael wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Thanks for the efforts here :)
>
> After a quick review, this seems ok. Some of the formatting is w
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the efforts here :)
After a quick review, this seems ok. Some of the formatting is wrong
(ie: not EFL style), however that is just a minor thing. One thing that
does concern me here tho is why:
+ wl_display_roundtrip(display);
is being called in the im_module_init ? That
