As you said in the commit message, and just to correct terminology:
You are not "forcing empty function parameters", it's just how the
syntax works.
int foo(); // Unspecified parameters
int foo(void); // No parameters
So probably it should be better described as "correct declaration of
fun
Hello.
On 26/11/15 17:39, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> As you said in the commit message, and just to correct terminology:
>
> You are not "forcing empty function parameters", it's just how the
> syntax works.
>
> int foo(); // Unspecified parameters
> int foo(void); // No parameters
>
> So probably i
Hey Tom,
On 27 November 2015 at 01:44, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 26/11/15 17:39, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > As you said in the commit message, and just to correct terminology:
> >
> > You are not "forcing empty function parameters", it's just how the
> > syntax works.
> >
> > int foo();
