I'm sorry for commits which don't follow EFL commit guidelines. Totally
we are follow the EFL guidelines, but some merge commit differs, because
project Eflete must to use internal git with Gerrit (it's rules of our R&D
center,
we can't change it).
And I'm totally agree with David. I subscribed Gi
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 18:36:30 -0500 Christopher Michael
wrote:
> On 12/02/2015 06:32 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:42:43 -0800 Cedric BAIL
> > said:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am just going to say that Mike proposal is the one that make most
> >> sense and will be the most
On 12/02/2015 06:32 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:42:43 -0800 Cedric BAIL said:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am just going to say that Mike proposal is the one that make most
>> sense and will be the most efficient for everyone without forever
>> discussing every little detail. We cou
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:42:43 -0800 Cedric BAIL said:
> Hello,
>
> I am just going to say that Mike proposal is the one that make most
> sense and will be the most efficient for everyone without forever
> discussing every little detail. We could even go as far as
> decomissionning our current mail
Hello,
I am just going to say that Mike proposal is the one that make most
sense and will be the most efficient for everyone without forever
discussing every little detail. We could even go as far as
decomissionning our current mailing list.
Cedric
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Mike Blumenkran
My preference would be to do away with the commit mailing list entirely.
It's easy to set a follow rule on phab for projects that you're interested
in, and this has the added benefit of reducing our reliance on the
failure-prone sourceforge infrastructure. Moreover, it would avoid future
arguments
I think leaving it like it is, or number two, would be the right option.
The commit ml is the easiest way for me to quickly get an idea of what is
going on across git, not just the core projects. "Oh look, edi added
faster syntax highlighting... Sweet!".
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Tom Hacoh
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm sending this email to raise an issue that has been annoying me for
> the last few months, but especially in the last couple of weeks.
>
> As it stands the Git ML is cluttered and it's very annoying for me to
> review commits that ar
Hey,
I'm sending this email to raise an issue that has been annoying me for
the last few months, but especially in the last couple of weeks.
As it stands the Git ML is cluttered and it's very annoying for me to
review commits that are of relevance to me. The problem, is that in the
Git ML we s
