> I consider that the e17/* cvs directory should only be used for things
> that will be an official part of E17. The main e17 developers decide
> what is and isn't official. I don't like that proto is in there, as I
> believe that proto is for things that are not yet finished enough to
> find a p
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 09:51:06 -0800 Blake Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> David Seikel wrote:
>
> >
> >I agree, a separate modules (but not e17/modules) directory,
> >e17/proto if we have to, or cvs at edevelop.org in that order of
> >preference for me.
>
> Ok. I'm fine with having everythi
So, it looks like we all agree that these things need to go in SOME sort of
publically accessible version control. Now we just need to decide on which.
A quick overview
---
sf.net CVS:
pros:
everyone knows where to find it
its the offic
David Seikel wrote:
>
>I agree, a separate modules (but not e17/modules) directory, e17/proto
>if we have to, or cvs at edevelop.org in that order of preference for
>me.
>
>
Ok. I'm fine with having everything in the main CVS tree (themes also?)
but part of the problem I'm trying to solve with
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:07:45 -0600 Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 11/3/05, Blake Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Please read my suggestion here:
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=enlightenment-devel&m=113100021920877&w=2
> >
> > If everyone agrees I can set this u
On 11/3/05, Blake Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please read my suggestion here:http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=enlightenment-devel&m=113100021920877&w=2
If everyone agrees I can set this up ASAP.
I'd prefer if we had them in our repository under proto or a separate
modules directory. If that w
Didier Casse wrote:
>On 11/3/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>*snip*
>
>
>>Why? Maintained, yes. Per author, no. Separately from CVS,
>>definitely not. Having it public encourages others to pick up where
>>the original author left off. CVS is first and foremost a
>>collabora
On 11/3/05, Ciro Mattia Gonano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3) there should be a CVS tree like:modules/snow/battery/monitor/evolume/...
I wholeheartedly agree with this, lets either move
them to e17/modules or int
Il giorno gio, 03/11/2005 alle 02.11 +1300, Dale Anderson ha scritto:
> Just a quick note to advise the e_modules directory has been removed
> from cvs.
>
[snip]
I'm not actually an e developer (just a "wannabe" one ^_^ ), but I'd
like to give you my point of view about the modules management qu
On 11/3/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*snip*
> Why? Maintained, yes. Per author, no. Separately from CVS,
> definitely not. Having it public encourages others to pick up where
> the original author left off. CVS is first and foremost a
> collaboration tool. Removing code fro
On Thursday, 03 November 2005, at 12:23:19 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> first - check cvs. the coded hasnt been removed. it's
> there. lurking.
I know; the first thing I said was that it had not yet been
removed. :)
> the problem is - a lot of these moduels have problems - lots of
> them.
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:36:23 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Thursday, 03 November 2005, at 02:11:12 (+1300),
> Dale Anderson wrote:
>
> > Just a quick note to advise the e_modules directory has been removed
> > from cvs.
>
> It has not been removed, and it will not be un
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:46:03 -0500 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > Please also note that modules_extra has been removed from the default E
> > module search path and modules need to be installed to ,
> >
> > $PREFIX/lib/enlightenment/modules or,
> > ~/.e/e/modules
> >
>
> Whats t
On 11/2/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ridiculous. It should be up to the module authors whether or not theywant to develop in our CVS tree or elsewhere, and whether or not theyhave abandoned their work or will continue maintaining it.
I have to agree with mej on this. I unders
> Please also note that modules_extra has been removed from the default E
> module search path and modules need to be installed to ,
>
> $PREFIX/lib/enlightenment/modules or,
> ~/.e/e/modules
>
Whats the point of removing this from the search path? It causes no
issues and allows people to keep
On Thursday, 03 November 2005, at 02:11:12 (+1300),
Dale Anderson wrote:
> Just a quick note to advise the e_modules directory has been removed
> from cvs.
It has not been removed, and it will not be unless and until such a
decision is made after discussion on this mailing list amongst the
develo
Hi All
Just a quick note to advise the e_modules directory has been removed
from cvs.
This was due to concern regarding the increasing number of modules being
commited, and the likely hood these would be left unmaintained .
These are now all updated and available from get-e.org (thanks devi
17 matches
Mail list logo
