Hi,
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:53:53 -0700
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> raster pushed a commit to branch master.
>
> http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=8689d54471aafdd7a5b5a27ce116bf2ab68c1042
>
> commit 8689d54471aafdd7a5b5a27ce116bf2ab68c1042
> Author: Carsten Haitzler (Rasterman)
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:09:44 +0300 Daniel Zaoui said:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:53:53 -0700
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > raster pushed a commit to branch master.
> >
> > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=8689d54471aafdd7a5b5a27ce116bf2ab68c1042
> >
> > commit 868
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:48:23 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:09:44 +0300 Daniel Zaoui
> said:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:53:53 -0700
> > Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> >
> > > raster pushed a commit to branch master.
> > >
> > > http://git.enl
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:22:42 +0300 Daniel Zaoui said:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:48:23 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:09:44 +0300 Daniel Zaoui
> > said:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:53:53 -0700
> > > Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> >
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Zaoui wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:48:23 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:09:44 +0300 Daniel Zaoui
>> said:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:53:53 -0700
>> > Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>> >
>> > > ras
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:12:30 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Zaoui
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:48:23 +0900
> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:09:44 +0300 Daniel Zaoui
> >> said:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:48:46 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
said:
> we do have an issue still - up for discussion here.
>
> obj = eo_add(SIMPLE_CLASS, NULL);
> obj2 = eo_add(SIMPLE_CLASS, obj);
>
> has obj2 at refcount of 1. as i would expect. BUT
>
> obj = eo_add(SIMPLE_CLASS, NULL);
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Carsten Haitzler
wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:12:30 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Zaoui
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:48:23 +0900
> > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015
On 21/08/15 07:07, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:12:30 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Zaoui
>>> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:48:23 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The
On 20/08/15 07:09, Daniel Zaoui wrote:
> The parent should never be !NULL when reaching the destructor. Imo, this code
> has not to be here. Instead, an error message should be displayed in the case
> the parent is still connected to the object. There is a bug but definitely
> the solution doesn
On 21/08/15 17:16, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 20/08/15 07:09, Daniel Zaoui wrote:
>> The parent should never be !NULL when reaching the destructor. Imo, this
>> code has not to be here. Instead, an error message should be displayed in
>> the case the parent is still connected to the object. There is
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:16:54 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 20/08/15 07:09, Daniel Zaoui wrote:
> > The parent should never be !NULL when reaching the destructor. Imo, this
> > code has not to be here. Instead, an error message should be displayed in
> > the case the parent is still connected to th
On 21/08/15 11:21, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 21/08/15 07:07, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:12:30 +0200 Cedric BAIL said:
>>>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Zaoui
wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug
I think the whole problem comes from the lack of concepts.
When we use referencing counting, it is meant for sharing
ownership. So, we shouldn't have to unparent before
eo_unref. However, parents own a reference to the object,
or else the object might disappear unexpectedly.
However, eo_add is no
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Felipe Magno de Almeida
wrote:
> I think the whole problem comes from the lack of concepts.
Well, it was fixed already. Thanks Tom.
> On elm_win.c:3636 we have:
>
>/* XXX: This hack is needed because we parent ourselves to an inside
> object.
> * That sh
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:15:32 -0300 Felipe Magno de Almeida
said:
> I think the whole problem comes from the lack of concepts.
>
> When we use referencing counting, it is meant for sharing
> ownership. So, we shouldn't have to unparent before
> eo_unref. However, parents own a reference to the ob
16 matches
Mail list logo
