Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/enlightenment] master 01/01: feature: handle xrandr backlight using a single, accurate handler

2014-01-21 Thread Chris Michael
On 21/01/14 22:39, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:38:21 + Chris Michael > wrote: > >> Ok, I try to spell it out .. sobberly (if possible) ;) >> >> "which means we no longer have to be constantly checking to > see if other apps have changed it " >> >> BUT What happens

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/enlightenment] master 01/01: feature: handle xrandr backlight using a single, accurate handler

2014-01-21 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:38:21 + Chris Michael wrote: > Ok, I try to spell it out .. sobberly (if possible) ;) > > "which means we no longer have to be constantly checking to > >>> see if other apps have changed it " > > BUT What happens if Another app DOES change it ?? If we are not longer

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/enlightenment] master 01/01: feature: handle xrandr backlight using a single, accurate handler

2014-01-21 Thread Chris Michael
Ok, I try to spell it out .. sobberly (if possible) ;) "which means we no longer have to be constantly checking to >>> see if other apps have changed it " BUT What happens if Another app DOES change it ?? If we are not longer listening, then how are we going to know that it was changed by Any a

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/enlightenment] master 01/01: feature: handle xrandr backlight using a single, accurate handler

2014-01-21 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
I have no idea what you're saying here. On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 22:22:49 + Chris Michael wrote: > Careful here Mike ... > > We not have to Check that an app has changed it ... but that Does Not > mean an App Did Not change it ;) > > think we should still have a listener/handler for that/those

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/enlightenment] master 01/01: feature: handle xrandr backlight using a single, accurate handler

2014-01-21 Thread Chris Michael
Careful here Mike ... We not have to Check that an app has changed it ... but that Does Not mean an App Did Not change it ;) think we should still have a listener/handler for that/those cases ... That being said, can we tell from the handler/signlar if it was an App change or an X change ? and