On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:59:01 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:17:52 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'll probably post it here as a patch and leave it up to raster or
> > CodeWarrior to actually commit it.
>
> So here it is. Not much d
On 1/8/06, David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:17:52 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'll probably post it here as a patch and leave it up to raster or
> > CodeWarrior to actually commit it.
>
> So here it is. Not much different from what Morten ha
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:28:44 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> While looking through apps/e/src looking for the proper way to do this,
> I found two things.
>
> There are many different styles used, so getting a consensus from the
> code is hard. I'll just pick one I like. B-)
>
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:17:52 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'll probably post it here as a patch and leave it up to raster or
> CodeWarrior to actually commit it.
So here it is. Not much different from what Morten had in mind. I
ended up not using the delete_me stuff, it wasn't
On 1/7/06, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Sharp wrote:
> > On 1/7/06, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> .. on a different note, it would be nice if you in the future snip
> >> quoted text.. had to scroll a few miles to get to your reply ;)
> >>
> >> and also, when maki
While looking through apps/e/src looking for the proper way to do this,
I found two things.
There are many different styles used, so getting a consensus from the
code is hard. I'll just pick one I like. B-)
Passing back an opaque pointer from the _add(), which you pass to the
_del(), which then
I'm going to change it now to be similar to the way that the other
apps/e callback add/del functions work. I'll do this by using the other
functions as templates and examples. I will do this now. I'm doing
this now because I'm trying to use it now, and I can progress faster if
I just fix it up n
David Sharp wrote:
On 1/7/06, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.. on a different note, it would be nice if you in the future snip
quoted text.. had to scroll a few miles to get to your reply ;)
and also, when making patches, make them unified (diff -u) please :)
WELL! if were going to
On 1/7/06, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
>
> > Your efm is kind of old, also you shouldnt make changes to it because
> > the problem is on the "client" api (_callback_set) on the e_menu.c
>
> I stated my efm was kind of old, yes.. I only tried being helpfu
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
On 1/7/06, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+++ e/src/bin/e_menu.c 2006-01-07 11:43:25.054986869 +0100
+void *
+e_menu_category_callback_add(char *category, void (*create) (E_Menu *m, void
*category_data, void *data), void (*free) (void *data), void *data)
On 1/7/06, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 04:24:35 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> >> David Seikel wrote:
> >>> Even if e_menu_category_callback_set() with the callback set to NULL was
> >>> impl
On 1/7/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 04:24:35 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > David Seikel wrote:
> > > Even if e_menu_category_callback_set() with the callback set to NULL was
> > > implemented, there is no unique paramet
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 04:24:35 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
David Seikel wrote:
Even if e_menu_category_callback_set() with the callback set to NULL was
implemented, there is no unique parameter in the function that would
identify which
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 04:24:35 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> David Seikel wrote:
> > Even if e_menu_category_callback_set() with the callback set to NULL was
> > implemented, there is no unique parameter in the function that would
> > identify which callback to remove. There wa
David Seikel wrote:
Even if e_menu_category_callback_set() with the callback set to NULL was
implemented, there is no unique parameter in the function that would
identify which callback to remove. There way be multiple callbacks
registered, that's why they are all added to a list. And that's wh
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 04:01:23 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> David Seikel wrote:
> > e_menu_category_callback_del().
>
> wouldn't that be semantically equal to calling
> e_menu_category_callback_set() with the callback set to NULL ?
If the e_menu_category_callback_set() code kn
David Seikel wrote:
e_menu_category_callback_del().
wouldn't that be semantically equal to calling
e_menu_category_callback_set() with the callback set to NULL ?
--
Morten
:wq
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 01:32:05 +0100 Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on the client (modules, or whatever)
>
> 1. e_menu_category_callback_set("fileman/action", _callback_create,
> _callback_free, local_data);
Big problem here. After a module has set the callback, if the module
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 01:32:05 +0100 Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all, here i attach the patch wich will add the functionality to add
> menu items outside the main routines of creating the menu. the idea is
> basically this:
Cool, this is something that is needed by the emu
Applied.
On 1/4/06, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all, here i attach the patch wich will add the functionality to add
> menu items outside the main routines of creating the menu. the idea is
> basically this:
>
> on the function where the e_menu_new is called
>
> 1. set th
hi all, here i attach the patch wich will add the functionality to add
menu items outside the main routines of creating the menu. the idea is
basically this:
on the function where the e_menu_new is called
1. set the category of the menu (i.e "fileman/action")
2. set some data to be passed to ever
21 matches
Mail list logo
