Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-13 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > there were only two patches that I saw which were supposed to be > committed: a trivial fix for cpufreq and the final e_start fix indeed, i missed the other one, thanks > On 11/13/12, Vincent Torri wrote: >> i've seen only the firs

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-13 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
there were only two patches that I saw which were supposed to be committed: a trivial fix for cpufreq and the final e_start fix On 11/13/12, Vincent Torri wrote: > i've seen only the first one in > > Vincent > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz > wrote: >> okay, both in >>

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-13 Thread Vincent Torri
i've seen only the first one in Vincent On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > okay, both in > > On 11/12/12, Iván Briano wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Vincent Torri >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz >>> wrote: On Mo

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-13 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
okay, both in On 11/12/12, Iván Briano wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Vincent Torri > wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz >> wrote: >>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:56:40 +0100 >>> rustyBSD wrote: >>> Le 12/11/2012 09:10, Vincent Torri a écrit : > On

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-12 Thread Iván Briano
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz > wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:56:40 +0100 >> rustyBSD wrote: >> >>> Le 12/11/2012 09:10, Vincent Torri a écrit : >>> > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Vincent Torri >>> > wrote: >>

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-12 Thread Vincent Torri
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:56:40 +0100 > rustyBSD wrote: > >> Le 12/11/2012 09:10, Vincent Torri a écrit : >> > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Vincent Torri >> > wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:56 PM, rustyBSD wrote: >> >>> >>

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-12 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:56:40 +0100 rustyBSD wrote: > Le 12/11/2012 09:10, Vincent Torri a écrit : > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Vincent Torri > > wrote: > >> > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:56 PM, rustyBSD wrote: > >>> >> Le 09/11/2012 18:40, Vincent Torri a écrit : > >>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-12 Thread rustyBSD
Le 12/11/2012 09:10, Vincent Torri a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:56 PM, rustyBSD wrote: >>> >> Le 09/11/2012 18:40, Vincent Torri a écrit : >>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:18 PM, rustyBSD wrote: >> > Le 09/11/2012 16:39,

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-12 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:56 PM, rustyBSD wrote: >> Le 09/11/2012 18:40, Vincent Torri a écrit : >>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:18 PM, rustyBSD wrote: > Le 09/11/2012 16:39, Vincent Torri a écrit : > >> I would suggest > >> > >

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-09 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:56 PM, rustyBSD wrote: > Le 09/11/2012 18:40, Vincent Torri a écrit : >> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:18 PM, rustyBSD wrote: >>> > Le 09/11/2012 16:39, Vincent Torri a écrit : >> I would suggest >> >> #if !defined(__OpenBSD) && etc >> >> instead o

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-09 Thread rustyBSD
Le 09/11/2012 18:40, Vincent Torri a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:18 PM, rustyBSD wrote: >> > Le 09/11/2012 16:39, Vincent Torri a écrit : >>> >> I would suggest >>> >> >>> >> #if !defined(__OpenBSD) && etc >>> >> >>> >> instead of >>> >> >>> >> #ifdef __linux__ >>> >> >>> >> As it will

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-09 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:18 PM, rustyBSD wrote: > Le 09/11/2012 16:39, Vincent Torri a écrit : >> I would suggest >> >> #if !defined(__OpenBSD) && etc >> >> instead of >> >> #ifdef __linux__ >> >> As it will work for Mac OS X, and probably on Solaris too >> >> Btw, it's strange that it works o

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-09 Thread rustyBSD
Le 09/11/2012 16:39, Vincent Torri a écrit : > I would suggest > > #if !defined(__OpenBSD) && etc > > instead of > > #ifdef __linux__ > > As it will work for Mac OS X, and probably on Solaris too > > Btw, it's strange that it works on Mac OS X and not in FreeBSD. Ah yes, forgot it. Ialso teste

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-09 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:33 PM, rustyBSD wrote: > Hi, > here are patches to fix compilation on OpenBSD and FreeBSD > (and NetBSD ?). > > - The 'tainted' variable is unused, so removed. > - Switch to execv(), as FreeBSD and OpenBSD doesn't have > PTRACE_GETSIGINFO I would suggest #if !defined(_

[E-devel] [PATCH] e17 & BSD's

2012-11-09 Thread rustyBSD
Hi, here are patches to fix compilation on OpenBSD and FreeBSD (and NetBSD ?). - The 'tainted' variable is unused, so removed. - Switch to execv(), as FreeBSD and OpenBSD doesn't have PTRACE_GETSIGINFO - Just moved to size_t to avoid warning on FreeBSD Thanks --- src/bin/e_start_main.c 2012-11-