On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:47 PM, thomasg wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:37 PM, thomasg wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Leif Middelschulte
>>> wrote:
Hello everyone,
If this lands,
https://phab.enlightenm
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:37 PM, thomasg wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Leif Middelschulte
>> wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> If this lands,
>>> https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/e18_with_systemd_user_session/ should
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:37 PM, thomasg wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Leif Middelschulte
> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> If this lands,
>> https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/e18_with_systemd_user_session/ should be
>> updated.
>
> I will do that once it is in. I talked to C
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Leif Middelschulte
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> If this lands,
> https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/e18_with_systemd_user_session/ should be
> updated.
>
> --
> Leif
>
I will do that once it is in. I talked to Cedric already and am
waiting until he gets his system
Hello everyone,
If this lands, https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/e18_with_systemd_user_session/
should be updated.
--
Leif
Am Samstag, 20. Juli 2013 um 16:50 schrieb Thomas Gstädtner:
>
> This has a few advantages over the current approach:
> - only depends on user-session-units, not the
This has a few advantages over the current approach:
- only depends on user-session-units, not the flawed systemd-user-units
- allows isolating the target to switch between e.g. e17 and e18 at
runtime
- works much more reliably for me
Important: please don't commit without review by Cedric!
