On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:45 PM, The Rasterman C
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:45 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:15:13
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:45 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:15:13 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > > For simplicity, I wou
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:45 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:15:13 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > For simplicity, I would just process one message per callback from
> > ecore_fd_main... but we can also us
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:15:13 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> For simplicity, I would just process one message per callback from
> ecore_fd_main... but we can also use a poll/select inside this
> function and do what you want, without the need to fcntl to
> NONBLOCKI
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:55:57 +0200 "Cedric BAIL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> I arleady though about some other possibilities :
> - make it optional in configure
> - only start it when required, but that's much more complex
> - only initialise it from required sub system (like later the cache
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:28 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:35:58 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:37 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > no
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:35:58 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:37 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > no need to make it blocking :) look at ecore_con - hell look at emotion.
> > it's
>
> Well, I looked at em
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:37 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no need to make it blocking :) look at ecore_con - hell look at emotion. it's
Well, I looked at emotion and damn, it's wrong! :-P
Ok, it will work for most of the cases where you are within the buffer
si
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:28:29 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:43 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:02:50 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >
> >
> >
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:43 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:02:50 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >This
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 14:02:50 -0300 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >This patch doesn't break anything at this time :-) It's a
> > standalone feature that just add the possibility to
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >This patch doesn't break anything at this time :-) It's a
> > standalone feature that just add the possibility to eva
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Cedric BAIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>This patch doesn't break anything at this time :-) It's a
> standalone feature that just add the possibility to evas to receive
> events from another thread. It introduce 3 new API.
I'm not sure the fd must be s
Hi,
This patch doesn't break anything at this time :-) It's a
standalone feature that just add the possibility to evas to receive
events from another thread. It introduce 3 new API.
* Retrieve the fd that need to be monitored by ecore :
EAPI int evas_async_events_fd_get();
* Process all pendi
15 matches
Mail list logo
