Gradients? Where we're going, we dont NEED gradients.
On 8 October 2010 07:48, wrote:
> But Doc, I'd need 1.21 gigawatts!
>
> --
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
> standards for HTML5, CS
But Doc, I'd need 1.21 gigawatts!
--
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more ti
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:56:26 +0200
> Cedric BAIL wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Gradient in Evas and Edje needs a lot of attention and love. We
>> currently have two implementations in Evas, gradient and gradient2.
>> The later was intended
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:56:26 +0200
Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Gradient in Evas and Edje needs a lot of attention and love. We
> currently have two implementations in Evas, gradient and gradient2.
> The later was intended to replace the former and should be easier to
> accelerate in hardware
Cedric wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Gradient in Evas and Edje needs a lot of attention and love. We
> currently have two implementations in Evas, gradient and gradient2.
> The later was intended to replace the former and should be easier to
> accelerate in hardware. But it never received enought attenti
Die, die, die lovely. I'm one that hate it and find mostly useless
other than demos or geek show offs. If you ask a GUI designer he will
probably come with a modified gradient and not a simple radial/linear
one with multiple steps and probably layers... At the end it turns to
be so slow that must b
Hi,
Gradient in Evas and Edje needs a lot of attention and love. We
currently have two implementations in Evas, gradient and gradient2.
The later was intended to replace the former and should be easier to
accelerate in hardware. But it never received enought attention,
that's why Edje still use
