On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:33:51 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Monday, 02 January 2006, at 12:46:32 (-0600),
> Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
>
> > I don't think there is a very cohesive plan on list use atm. I've
> > heard a few rumblings of people saying "ecore lists suck" or "ev
On Monday, 02 January 2006, at 22:36:43 (+0100),
Morten Nilsen wrote:
> well, List2 is flagged as deprecated in the source (thus my patches)
> and List is not double linked.. DList is
Sarcasm.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., h
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Monday, 02 January 2006, at 12:46:32 (-0600),
Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
I don't think there is a very cohesive plan on list use atm. I've
heard a few rumblings of people saying "ecore lists suck" or "evas
lists suck" but as usual it's a case of choosing the best tool fo
On Monday, 02 January 2006, at 12:46:32 (-0600),
Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
> I don't think there is a very cohesive plan on list use atm. I've
> heard a few rumblings of people saying "ecore lists suck" or "evas
> lists suck" but as usual it's a case of choosing the best tool for
> the job and knowi
Ecore_List is heavy if you have a lot of very small lists. It has a small set of pointers it keeps as head node for the list. The per-node memory use is smaller than Evas_List because Evas_List is a dlist and also keeps an extra pointer per-node to act as a skip-list, so the comparative memory use
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:11:23 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 12:53:58 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > David; you might want to absorb the ecore_exe part of this patch
> > into your current work :)
>
> It's next on my list to look it your
Morten Nilsen wrote:
okay, I'm almost done with this now...
only thing that needs to be converted at this point is ecore_event...
I'll get on that later..
Okay, that last patch had some bugs.. this new patch works better...
This has been tested with ecore_test and timer_example from ecore...
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 12:53:58 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> David; you might want to absorb the ecore_exe part of this patch into
> your current work :)
It's next on my list to look it your patch after my current task.
Unless something more important comes up, like a bug I need
okay, I'm almost done with this now...
only thing that needs to be converted at this point is ecore_event...
I'll get on that later..
David; you might want to absorb the ecore_exe part of this patch into
your current work :)
Cheers,
--
Morten
:wq
Index: ecore_events.c
===