Hello.
On 05/05/15 19:44, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Hello
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 20/04/15 14:53, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Tom Hacohen
>> wrote:
On 20/04/15 13:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> H
Hello
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 20/04/15 14:53, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 20/04/15 13:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >>> Hello.
> >>>
> >>> 1.14 is one a good way now an it is about t
On Mon, 04 May 2015 11:28:26 +0200 Stefan Schmidt
said:
> Hello.
>
>
> On 20/04/15 14:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > 1.14 is one a good way now an it is about time to discuss the schedule for
> > 1.15
> >
> > Tom approached me with a suggestion to ease the predictability of our
>
Hello.
On 20/04/15 14:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 1.14 is one a good way now an it is about time to discuss the schedule for
> 1.15
>
> Tom approached me with a suggestion to ease the predictability of our release
> dates.
> Instead of doing a schedule being aligned with the 12 weeks
On 22/04/15 08:24, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 22/04/15 08:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 20/04/15 14:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> 1.14 is one a good way now an it is about time to discuss the schedule for
>>> 1.15
>>>
>>> Tom approached me with a suggestion to ease the p
On 22/04/15 08:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 20/04/15 14:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> 1.14 is one a good way now an it is about time to discuss the schedule for
>> 1.15
>>
>> Tom approached me with a suggestion to ease the predictability of our
>> release dates.
>> Instea
Hello.
On 20/04/15 14:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 1.14 is one a good way now an it is about time to discuss the schedule for
> 1.15
>
> Tom approached me with a suggestion to ease the predictability of our release
> dates.
> Instead of doing a schedule being aligned with the 12 weeks
Hello.
On 20/04/15 14:53, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> On 20/04/15 13:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> 1.14 is one a good way now an it is about time to discuss the schedule
>> for 1.15
>>> Tom approached me with a suggestion to e
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 20/04/15 13:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > 1.14 is one a good way now an it is about time to discuss the schedule
> for 1.15
> >
> > Tom approached me with a suggestion to ease the predictability of our
> release dates.
> > In
On 20/04/15 13:15, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 1.14 is one a good way now an it is about time to discuss the schedule for
> 1.15
>
> Tom approached me with a suggestion to ease the predictability of our release
> dates.
> Instead of doing a schedule being aligned with the 12 weeks he sugge
Hello.
1.14 is one a good way now an it is about time to discuss the schedule for 1.15
Tom approached me with a suggestion to ease the predictability of our release
dates.
Instead of doing a schedule being aligned with the 12 weeks he suggested that
we use the first Monday of a month every thre
11 matches
Mail list logo
