On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 09:39:31 +0200 Viktor Kojouharov
said:
> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 20:07 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Viktor Kojouharov
> > wrote:
> > > I've been curiously looking at the python bindings for the efl, and the
> > > more I look, the mo
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 20:07 -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Viktor Kojouharov
> wrote:
> > I've been curiously looking at the python bindings for the efl, and the
> > more I look, the more this question seems to come up in my mind:
> >
> > Why are we not r
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
> I've been curiously looking at the python bindings for the efl, and the
> more I look, the more this question seems to come up in my mind:
>
> Why are we not returning 'self' in all those setter methods?
>
> let's take for instance the met
I've been curiously looking at the python bindings for the efl, and the
more I look, the more this question seems to come up in my mind:
Why are we not returning 'self' in all those setter methods?
let's take for instance the methods of elm_check. Instead of just
claling elm_check_label_set and c
