I'm currently in the process of building some new ebuilds for Gentoo
that use the asparagus builds. There are a few packages out there that
are quite outdated and several that are missing.
Here is the current status as of this now. This is what I would consider
to be a 'core' listing, so no offens
Some spec and Makefile.am fixes for edje and e.
what's the odds of getting commit access to assist keeping this stuff up
to date?
Ryan
Index: apps/e/enlightenment.spec
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/enlightenment/e17/apps/e/enlightenment.spe
On Monday, 02 August 2004, at 13:02:14 (+0200),
Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
> That's exactly the point.
>
> a) Eugenia wouldn't give us the time of day under *any* circumstances
> *except* if we were trying to bring back or emulate BeOS.
I'm not sure she even *knows* the time of day
On Aug 3, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Peter Lundqvist wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
Let's see whether we agree on the basics then, shall we.
Looking at OSNews, the comments from the E-team, as far as they can
easily be identified, are +1 Informative. The Eugenia's comments
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 10:02 am, Peter Lundqvist wrote:
> Anyway - what I'm upset about is not who did what. It's the bad attitude.
> You don't have to badmouth anyone just because you disagree.
> A simple "Obviously she's wrong; here is why" is more than sufficient.
i wasnt bad mouthing her be
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:02:08 +0200 (CEST) Peter Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
> > Let's see whether we agree on the basics then, shall we.
> > Looking at OSNews, the comments from the E-team, as far as they can
> >
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
> Let's see whether we agree on the basics then, shall we.
> Looking at OSNews, the comments from the E-team, as far as they can
> easily be identified, are +1 Informative. The Eugenia's comments
> -1 Troll. If we agree this far, then it
> > b) I have never read anything of Eugenia's that I didn't consider crap.
>
> yeah, i thought it was universally understood that Eugenia is a fucking
> moron ?
This upsets me on so many levels.
Let me just be frank and say that this sort of trolling is what gives OSS
advocates a bad reputation
On Monday 02 August 2004 07:02 am, Cristalle Azundris Sabon wrote:
> b) I have never read anything of Eugenia's that I didn't consider crap.
yeah, i thought it was universally understood that Eugenia is a fucking
moron ?
-mike
---
This SF.Ne
Insidently, this comment was made by the Editor-in-Cheif of OSNews
(Eugina). The wonderful thing about this comment is that I think most
of us would agree that DR16 (obviously what she refers to) the thing
that really keeps you running E isn't the eye candy but the easy of
interaction and sim
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 11:53:32 +0200
Alan Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the words:
> * Ben Rockwood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > My persona fav is:
> > " All I have to say about Enlightenment is that it's unusable.
> > Visual Usability is really thrown out of the window in favor of eye
> >
* Ben Rockwood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> My persona fav is:
> " All I have to say about Enlightenment is that it's unusable. Visual
> Usability is really thrown out of the window in favor of eye candy. Now,
> if the target of these developers is to simply research the "coolness"
> of thing
As several people pointed out today, OSNews has reported Asparagus.
(BTW, if you come to LW, ask Raster how he chose the name, it's a great
story.)
The story can be found here: http://osnews.com/story.php?news_id=7888
As usual, the user comments are fast, furious, and unbelievably stupidly
f**ki
13 matches
Mail list logo
