On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 13:12:42 +0100 Christopher Michael
wrote:
> On 09/09/13 11:58, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >
> > Great, I look forward to have a revoke party with that list you
> > come up with.
> >
>
> As long as we can have cake too ;)
/me brings popcorn.
> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:
On 09/09/13 14:12, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 09/09/13 14:01, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 09/09/13 13:58, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>> On 09/09/13 13:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 09/09/13 13:48, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 09/09/13 13:16, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 09/09/13 13:14, S
On 09/09/13 14:01, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 09/09/13 13:58, Christopher Michael wrote:
>> On 09/09/13 13:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 09/09/13 13:48, Christopher Michael wrote:
On 09/09/13 13:16, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 09/09/13 13:14, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 0
On 09/09/13 13:58, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 09/09/13 13:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 09/09/13 13:48, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>> On 09/09/13 13:16, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 09/09/13 13:14, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 09/09/2013 01:06 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> O
On 09/09/13 13:51, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 09/09/13 13:48, Christopher Michael wrote:
>> On 09/09/13 13:16, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 09/09/13 13:14, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On 09/09/2013 01:06 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 09/09/13 12:26, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>> On Mo
On 09/09/13 13:48, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 09/09/13 13:16, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 09/09/13 13:14, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> On 09/09/2013 01:06 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 09/09/13 12:26, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Michael
On 09/09/13 13:16, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 09/09/13 13:14, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 09/09/2013 01:06 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 09/09/13 12:26, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Michael
wrote:
> On 09/09/13 10:22, Tom Hacohen
On 09/09/13 13:14, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 09/09/2013 01:06 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 09/09/13 12:26, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Michael
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 09/09/13 10:22, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 09/09/13 08:45, Michael Blumenkr
On 09/09/13 11:58, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>
> Great, I look forward to have a revoke party with that list you come up with.
>
As long as we can have cake too ;)
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Christopher Michael
> mailto:cp.mich...@samsung.com>> wrote:
> On 09/09/13 11:53, Michael Blu
Hello.
On 09/09/2013 01:06 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 09/09/13 12:26, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Michael
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/09/13 10:22, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 09/09/13 08:45, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> I think I'd like to see patches be
On 09/09/13 12:26, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Michael
> wrote:
>
>> On 09/09/13 10:22, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 09/09/13 08:45, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
I think I'd like to see patches being submitted/reviewed on the mailing
list at the leas
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Michael
wrote:
> On 09/09/13 10:22, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > On 09/09/13 08:45, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >> I think I'd like to see patches being submitted/reviewed on the mailing
> >> list at the least before giving blanket commit access because a pe
Awesome party is coming up!
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz <
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great, I look forward to have a revoke party with that list you come up
> with.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Christopher Michael <
> cp.
Great, I look forward to have a revoke party with that list you come up
with.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 09/09/13 11:53, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>
>> You keep saying double standards: feel free to provide examples so I can
>> revoke the appropriate comm
On 09/09/13 11:53, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> You keep saying double standards: feel free to provide examples so I can
> revoke the appropriate commit access.
>
Keep saying ?? Only said it once ;)
Sure, will take some time to dig through all the fairly recent
additions, but yea no worries.
dh
You keep saying double standards: feel free to provide examples so I can
revoke the appropriate commit access.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 09/09/13 10:22, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > On 09/09/13 08:45, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >> I think I'd like to see patc
On 09/09/13 10:22, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 09/09/13 08:45, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> I think I'd like to see patches being submitted/reviewed on the mailing
>> list at the least before giving blanket commit access because a person's
>> work fits our requirements or is something that is "needed
Hello.
On 09/09/2013 10:30 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>> On 09/09/2013 08:45 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> I think I'd like to see patches being submitted/reviewed on the mailing
>>> list at the least before giving blanket com
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 08:45 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> I think I'd like to see patches being submitted/reviewed on the mailing
>> list at the least before giving blanket commit access because a person's
>
> Our git setup allows commit
On 09/09/13 08:45, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> I think I'd like to see patches being submitted/reviewed on the mailing
> list at the least before giving blanket commit access because a person's
> work fits our requirements or is something that is "needed".
>
> I don't really want to get into a sc
Hello.
On 09/09/2013 08:45 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> I think I'd like to see patches being submitted/reviewed on the mailing
> list at the least before giving blanket commit access because a person's
Our git setup allows commit rights to specific repos or even branches
only. If we want w
I think I'd like to see patches being submitted/reviewed on the mailing
list at the least before giving blanket commit access because a person's
work fits our requirements or is something that is "needed".
I don't really want to get into a scenario where, as a community, we give
people commit acce
Hello All,
Deasung Kim is an engineer in Samsung HQ who is working on resuming the
evdev wrapper library work (part of our wayland requirements) that
Daniel started when he was here.
If there are no objections, I would like to add him for commit access so
he can push his changes upstream.
Kin
23 matches
Mail list logo