It's possible that it's imlib2. EWL links against epsilon which links
against imlib2, but I don't think imlib2 links against eet directly.
On 3/4/07, Paulo J. Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/28/07, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > look for /usr/lib/libe*, and delete
On 2/28/07, Nathan Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > look for /usr/lib/libe*, and delete any enlightenment related ones, then
> > recompile everything in order (eet, evas, ecore, embryo, edje, ...)
> >
Removed a whole bunch of them but now I get libeet instead of libedge
in the error wh
Also check /usr/local/lib/libe* as you may have installed there at one
point and had a stale ref to something in /usr/lib.
On 2/28/07, Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 06:30:33PM +, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> > On 2/27/07, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 06:30:33PM +, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> On 2/27/07, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 27 February 2007, at 14:38:44 (-0600),
> > Brian Mattern wrote:
> >
> > > But the practical suggestion in the email (removing crufty installs from
> > > old pref
On 2/27/07, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 February 2007, at 14:38:44 (-0600),
> Brian Mattern wrote:
>
> > But the practical suggestion in the email (removing crufty installs from
> > old prefixes) is correct, no?
>
> Not necessarily. The .la file which refers to the
On Tuesday, 27 February 2007, at 14:38:44 (-0600),
Brian Mattern wrote:
> But the practical suggestion in the email (removing crufty installs from
> old prefixes) is correct, no?
Not necessarily. The .la file which refers to the now-missing
/usr/lib/libedje.la could be anywhere, even in /usr/loc
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:02:29PM -0500, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 February 2007, at 13:57:27 (-0600),
> Brian Mattern wrote:
>
> > The error message about /usr/lib/libedje.la not existing indicates
> > that you probably have an old partial install in /usr/lib. ld is
> > finding so
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 07:53:46PM +, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> On 2/27/07, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 27 February 2007, at 19:07:42 (+),
> > Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> >
> > > grep: /usr/lib/libedje.la: No such file or directory
> > > /usr/bin/sed: can't read /u
On Tuesday, 27 February 2007, at 13:57:27 (-0600),
Brian Mattern wrote:
> The error message about /usr/lib/libedje.la not existing indicates
> that you probably have an old partial install in /usr/lib. ld is
> finding some lib there (instead of /usr/local/lib) which refers to
> /usr/lib/libedje.la
On Tuesday, 27 February 2007, at 19:53:46 (+),
Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> > One of the .la files used in that link line refers to
> > /usr/lib/libedje.la.
>
> Can't find anyone on the line I posted regarding /usr/lib/libedje.la and
> # pwd
> /usr/local/stow
> # grep -R "/usr/lib/libedje.la" *
>
On 2/27/07, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 27 February 2007, at 19:07:42 (+),
> Paulo J. Matos wrote:
>
> > grep: /usr/lib/libedje.la: No such file or directory
> > /usr/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libedje.la: No such file or directory
> > libtool: link: `/usr/lib/li
On Tuesday, 27 February 2007, at 19:07:42 (+),
Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> grep: /usr/lib/libedje.la: No such file or directory
> /usr/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libedje.la: No such file or directory
> libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libedje.la' is not a valid libtool archive
>
> Well, I can't find a
Well, hello all,
I'm compiling E17 to /usr/loca/stow/ and then use stow (gnu stow)
to create links on /usr/local/. Everything went fine up until ewl.
I went through in this order:
imlib, eet, edb, evas, ecore, epeg, edje, epsilon, embryo, esmart, ewl!!!
Ewl compiles find but when linking:
/bin/sh
13 matches
Mail list logo
