On Thursday, 16 December 2004, at 12:41:44 (-0500),
Mike Frysinger wrote:
i meant the extra mmx code that is included in Eterm is still broken
on amd64
i wasnt implying anything about imlib2 / mmx in general
Not to detract from the wonderful fingerpointing and such...but would
someone like
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:41:44 -0500 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 10:58 pm, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
no. its broken only if you use amd64 64bit SPECIFIC optimisation flags in
your CFLAGS. if you do not, it is fine (as it will compile 32bit
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 14:27:09 -0500 Michael Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Thursday, 16 December 2004, at 12:41:44 (-0500),
Mike Frysinger wrote:
i meant the extra mmx code that is included in Eterm is still broken
on amd64
i wasnt implying anything
On Wednesday 15 December 2004 10:58 pm, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
no. its broken only if you use amd64 64bit SPECIFIC optimisation flags in
your CFLAGS. if you do not, it is fine (as it will compile 32bit code). if
you compiler somehow compiles 645bit code by default - you will need to
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:49:29 -0500 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 06:44 pm, Angus McMorland wrote:
Now I'm trying to compile the CVS
source and I get a few of these (with variations on a theme):
try disabling mmx ... i'm pretty sure
