and backport to the 1.0 branch
Vincent
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> edje: update ChangeLog
>
> Author: billiob
> Date: 2011-10-02 14:10:15 -0700 (Sun, 02 Oct 2011)
> New Revision: 63754
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/63754
>
> M
On Sat, 21 May 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011 20:44:33 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> said:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 20 May 2011, Boris Faure wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 18:53, Boris Faure wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 18:48, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
On Fri, 20 May 2011 20:44:33 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Fri, 20 May 2011, Boris Faure wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 18:53, Boris Faure wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 18:48, Vincent Torri wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 20 May 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> >>>
>
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 20:44, Vincent Torri wrote:
> why not putting the version directly in the name of the module path ?
>
> Vincent
I copied it from enlightenment.
--
Boris Faure
--
What Every C/C++ and Fortran deve
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Boris Faure wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 18:53, Boris Faure wrote:
>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 18:48, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 20 May 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>>>
Log:
edje: add vmaj and module to edje.pc
>>>
>>> which module ?
>> edje ex
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 18:53, Boris Faure wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 18:48, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 20 May 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>>
>>> Log:
>>> edje: add vmaj and module to edje.pc
>>
>> which module ?
> edje external modules.
The main question is whether to export
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 18:48, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 20 May 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>
>> Log:
>> edje: add vmaj and module to edje.pc
>
> which module ?
edje external modules.
--
Boris Faure
--
What
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> edje: add vmaj and module to edje.pc
which module ?
Vincent
>
> Author: billiob
> Date: 2011-05-20 09:41:28 -0700 (Fri, 20 May 2011)
> New Revision: 59556
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/59556
>
> M
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:30, Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
> I'd like to throw in a suggestion to just extract the syntax file from the
> vimball in edje/data and use that. It is much more feature complete
You're right. I've had the edc.vim linked in ~/.vim/syntax for such a
long time that i never n
I'd like to throw in a suggestion to just extract the syntax file from the
vimball in edje/data and use that. It is much more feature complete
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Enlightenment SVN <
no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
> Log:
> edje: improve vim syntax file and become the maintainer
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 23:42, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 26.01.2010, 14:34 -0800 schrieb Enlightenment SVN:
>> Log:
>> edje: remove useless code (Composing is done in xlib, in ecore_x, you need
>> to compile ecore with --enable-xim)
>
> Doesn't this break for non-X backe
Am Dienstag, den 26.01.2010, 14:34 -0800 schrieb Enlightenment SVN:
> Log:
> edje: remove useless code (Composing is done in xlib, in ecore_x, you need
> to compile ecore with --enable-xim)
Doesn't this break for non-X backends, like directfb, sdl, framebuffer?
:M:
12 matches
Mail list logo