On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Enlightenment SVN
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> use HUGE_VAL instead of a strange double/float numerical value
>>>
>>> do I have to add -lm to Libs in
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
Log:
use HUGE_VAL instead of a strange double/float numerical value
do I have to add -lm to Libs in edje.pc ?
Wouldn't that be to link to the library? Shouldn't be needed if you
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> use HUGE_VAL instead of a strange double/float numerical value
>
> do I have to add -lm to Libs in edje.pc ?
>
Wouldn't that be to link to the library? Shouldn't be needed if you
only use the header.
> Author: caro
> Date
2009/11/7 Peter Wehrfritz
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Log:
> >> * rename _edje_strbuf_append to _edje_strbuf_append1 and
> >> _edje_strbuf_append2 in edje_util.c and edje_textblock_styles.c
> >> respectivel
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
>
>> Log:
>> * rename _edje_strbuf_append to _edje_strbuf_append1 and
>> _edje_strbuf_append2 in edje_util.c and edje_textblock_styles.c
>> respectiveley (for amalgamation. See next commit)
>>
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
Log:
* rename _edje_strbuf_append to _edje_strbuf_append1 and
_edje_strbuf_append2 in edje_util.c and edje_textblock_styles.c
respectiveley (for amalgamation. See next commi
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> * rename _edje_strbuf_append to _edje_strbuf_append1 and
> _edje_strbuf_append2 in edje_util.c and edje_textblock_styles.c
> respectiveley (for amalgamation. See next commit)
well, I really think strbuf should be in eina,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> Cedric told me that i can even removed, in edje_calc, the parameters that I
> have marked as unused.
>
> Is there an objection ?
go for it!
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
--
Cedric told me that i can even removed, in edje_calc, the parameters that
I have marked as unused.
Is there an objection ?
Vincent
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
* remove unused parameters (except in edje_lua.c, as i don't know the current
status)
* remove unused v
