Hey Leandro,
That's the first idea he had. I was against it, and he came to agree with
me.
The reason for that, is that it doesn't imply there's something going on at
the end, and it's more likely people will return/go out in the middle of
the block.
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Leandro Per
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> +#define EINA_COW_WRITE_BEGIN(Cow, Read, Write_Type, Write) \
> + do \
> +{ \
> + Wri
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> wrote:
>>> This macro declares a variable and do a mix of do-while split into two
>>> macros that will likely cau
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 21/01/13 11:22, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> wrote:
>>> This macro declares a variable and do a mix of do-while split into two
>>> macros that will likely cause errors. Why did you choos
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> This macro declares a variable and do a mix of do-while split into two
>> macros that will likely cause errors. Why did you choose that over let user
>> declare the variable
On 21/01/13 11:22, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> This macro declares a variable and do a mix of do-while split into two
>> macros that will likely cause errors. Why did you choose that over let user
>> declare the variable, avoiding the
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> This macro declares a variable and do a mix of do-while split into two
> macros that will likely cause errors. Why did you choose that over let user
> declare the variable, avoiding the do-while?
Because you need to execute someth
This macro declares a variable and do a mix of do-while split into two
macros that will likely cause errors. Why did you choose that over let user
declare the variable, avoiding the do-while?
On Monday, January 21, 2013, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> efl: add eina_cow helper macro.
>
>
> Aut
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Enlightenment SVN <
> no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
>> Log:
>> efl: add a way to allocate without memcpy data in an Eina_Inarray.
>
> could you name it _grow() and make it take an integer inst
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Enlightenment SVN <
no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
> Log:
> efl: add a way to allocate without memcpy data in an Eina_Inarray.
>
could you name it _grow() and make it take an integer instead of just 1? I
bet it will be useful if you have a couple of items an
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> I see 2 remaining problems:
>
> line 149:
>
>tw = _eina_thread_win32_find(index);
>
> index is not defined. Do you mean t instead of index ?
Yes, fixed.
> Second problem : _current_index. It is initialized to 1, then the only
> other us
I see 2 remaining problems:
line 149:
tw = _eina_thread_win32_find(index);
index is not defined. Do you mean t instead of index ?
Second problem : _current_index. It is initialized to 1, then the only
other use of _current_index is :
do {
tw->index = _current_index++;
12 matches
Mail list logo
