On 04/09/2011 01:52 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 22:48:47 -0700
Enlightenment SVNno-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Edje: Edje_Text: Don't segfault on _edje_text_part_on_del if there is
not 'part'
Don't ask me how I found this one, but it happened :/ so trap
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 22:48:47 -0700
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Edje: Edje_Text: Don't segfault on _edje_text_part_on_del if there is
not 'part'
Don't ask me how I found this one, but it happened :/ so trap for
valid part before trying to use it.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Rename 'same named' macros.
NB - Please use different macro names in the future for stuff like this
(ie: not the same macro name in each file) as it spits nasty compiler
warnings when compiling w/
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:19:31 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
but putting them in a header that is public... is bad. (such short named
macros). easy to conflict.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Rename
On 08/02/2010 05:19 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Rename 'same named' macros.
NB - Please use different macro names in the future for stuff like this
(ie: not the same macro name in each
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Christopher Michael
cpmicha...@comcast.net wrote:
On 08/02/2010 05:19 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Rename 'same named' macros.
NB - Please use different macro
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
Don't need 2 of the same variables.
imho, -Wshadow should be used to remove all those cases. See eina's
configure on how i did that
Vincent
Author: devilhorns
Date: 2010-07-23 19:28:24 -0700 (Fri, 23 Jul 2010)
New
Unfortunately there is no safe way of printing it in C89 (ie
windows). The best way is:
printf(... %ld..,(unsigned int)blah);
note that, on Windows 64 bits, a long is of size 32 bits :)
Why do people use this again? ;-)
I assume neither inttypes.h or stdint.h don't exist either?
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:32:25 +1100 Brett Nash n...@nash.id.au wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:51:01 +0100 (CET)
Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
Unfortunately there is no safe way of printing it in C89 (ie windows).
Windows is stuck in the '80s? Why am I not surprised?
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 5:32 AM, Brett Nash n...@nash.id.au wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:51:01 +0100 (CET)
Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:07 AM,
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:44:23AM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
Unfortunately there is no safe way of printing it in C89 (ie windows).
The best way is:
printf(... %ld..,(unsigned int)blah);
%ld and unsigned int? You must be joking... Defining PRIdMAX and friends
can be
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:25:17 +0100
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:44:23AM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
Unfortunately there is no safe way of printing it in C89 (ie
windows). The best way is:
printf(... %ld..,(unsigned
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:25:17 +0100
Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:44:23AM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
Unfortunately there is no safe way of printing it in C89 (ie
windows). The best way is:
printf(... %ld..,(unsigned
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 11:03:33AM +1100, Brett Nash wrote:
%ld and unsigned int? You must be joking... Defining PRIdMAX and
friends can be easily automated.
Unfortunately although PRIdMAX is useful, I don't believe there is one
for size_t. Instead you use the %z modifier, which leads us
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Fix printing of size_t value(s). (removes compiler warning).
They invented z modifier for that, see man 3 printf
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
http://profusion.mobi embedded systems
On 12/29/2009 11:01 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Fix printing of size_t value(s). (removes compiler warning).
They invented z modifier for that, see man 3 printf
Indeed, but didn't know off
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Fix printing of size_t value(s). (removes compiler warning).
They invented z modifier for that, see man 3 printf
it does not exist on Windows:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Fix printing of size_t value(s). (removes compiler warning).
They invented z modifier for that, see
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:51:01 +0100 (CET)
Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Fix
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Brett Nash wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:51:01 +0100 (CET)
Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Enlightenment SVN
20 matches
Mail list logo
