missing changelog and news update
Vincent
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
add ecore_main_fd_handler_file_add() for use with regular files.
epoll does not handle reading from files since it is only a mechanism for
determining whether
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:46:00 +0200
Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
missing changelog and news update
Vincent
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
add ecore_main_fd_handler_file_add() for use with regular files.
epoll
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:53:19 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.com said:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:51:06 -0800
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
add more descriptive error messages for epoll flag mod failure
Author: discomfitor
Date:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:51:06 -0800
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
add more descriptive error messages for epoll flag mod failure
Author: discomfitor
Date: 2011-02-15 11:51:06 -0800 (Tue, 15 Feb 2011)
New Revision: 57063
Trac:
Quoting Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.com:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:00:38 +0100
vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
Quoting Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.com:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:38:56 +0100
vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
changelog ? should this be pushed to 1.0 ?
Quoting Enlightenment
changelog ? should this be pushed to 1.0 ?
Quoting Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org:
Log:
From: Mike McCormack mj.mccorm...@samsung.com
Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH] Remove SIGRT stuff
Unused, and doesn't work as it stands. Delete...
Author: discomfitor
Date:
Quoting Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.com:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:38:56 +0100
vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
changelog ? should this be pushed to 1.0 ?
Quoting Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org:
whoops, forgot changelog. ask the other mike about 1.0, I'm not sure
it's even
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:00:38 +0100
vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
Quoting Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.com:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:38:56 +0100
vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
changelog ? should this be pushed to 1.0 ?
Quoting Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org:
whoops,
ChangeLog...
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
From: Mike McCormack mj.mccorm...@samsung.com
Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH] ecore main loop fd_handlers_to_call list
optimization
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:22:13 +0900
Hi All,
Rather than using malloc'ed list entries in
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 08:43:42 +0100 (CET)
Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
ChangeLog...
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
forgot
--
Mike Blumenkrantz
Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off!
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:34:49 -0800
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
switch to EINA_BOOL values for delete_me, fix huge O(n) behavior in
_ecore_main_fd_handlers_call; all fd operations now should see an exponential
speed increase based on the number of fds that ecore is
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
switch to EINA_BOOL values for delete_me, fix huge O(n) behavior in
_ecore_main_fd_handlers_call; all fd operations now should see an exponential
speed increase based on the number of fds that ecore is watching
next time, split the
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:07:53 +0100 (CET)
Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
switch to EINA_BOOL values for delete_me, fix huge O(n) behavior in
_ecore_main_fd_handlers_call; all fd operations now should see an
exponential
Ops, you've screwed it all!
Non-opt does not include argv[0], if no opts the correct return is argc!
The logic to users should be:
If 0: error
Else if == argc: no non-opt args
Else: non-opt args from it to argc
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:34:54 -0200
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
Ops, you've screwed it all!
Non-opt does not include argv[0], if no opts the correct return is argc!
That makes no sense. You can't do argv[argc]. If there are no other non '-'
options, argv[0] IS the
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz m...@zentific.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:34:54 -0200
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
Ops, you've screwed it all!
Non-opt does not include argv[0], if no opts the correct return is argc!
That makes no sense.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
revert bitfielding of a bool to avoid possible abi break
it's not just api break, it wouldn't work as the code gets a reference
to it AFAIK (can't check the code now)
--
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
add ecore_con strings
Author: discomfitor
Date: 2010-11-06 10:06:56 -0700 (Sat, 06 Nov 2010)
New Revision: 54241
Modified:
trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore.c
I think that those strings should not go into ecore.c
Vincent
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
add data freeing support to ecore thread data api
TO FUTURE MIKE: you were too tired to update the doxy last night and instead
of writing the doxy updates you fell
forget it, you removed it in a commit later
Vincent
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
add data freeing support to ecore thread data api
TO FUTURE MIKE: you were too tired to update the doxy last night and
instead of writing
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
correctly init some variables that I missed somehow. I blame Sachiel.
Author: discomfitor
Date: 2010-07-23 15:28:18 -0700 (Fri, 23 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 50465
Modified:
trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore_thread.c
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
Because it's easier for people unfamiliar with it to read the code this
way and they're static variables.
you know how people's way of thinking ? What is important is having a
consistent code. Even static variables.
Vincent
On Tue, 20 Jul
Because it's easier for people unfamiliar with it to read the code this
way and they're static variables.
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:54:41 +0200 (CEST)
Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
some variable renames to make this easier to
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
some variable renames to make this easier to understand
Author: discomfitor
Date: 2010-07-20 02:40:53 -0700 (Tue, 20 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 50376
Modified:
trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore_thread.c
Modified:
24 matches
Mail list logo
