Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2012-08-01 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:46:00 +0200 Vincent Torri wrote: > missing changelog and news update > > Vincent > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Enlightenment SVN > wrote: > > Log: > > add ecore_main_fd_handler_file_add() for use with regular files. > > epoll does not handle reading from files sin

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2012-08-01 Thread Vincent Torri
missing changelog and news update Vincent On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > add ecore_main_fd_handler_file_add() for use with regular files. > epoll does not handle reading from files since it is only a mechanism for > determining whether a fd is ready for read

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2011-02-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:53:19 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:51:06 -0800 > "Enlightenment SVN" wrote: > > > Log: > > add more descriptive error messages for epoll flag mod failure > > > > > > Author: discomfitor > > Date: 2011-02-15 11:51:06 -0800 (Tue,

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2011-02-15 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:51:06 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN" wrote: > Log: > add more descriptive error messages for epoll flag mod failure > > > Author: discomfitor > Date: 2011-02-15 11:51:06 -0800 (Tue, 15 Feb 2011) > New Revision: 57063 > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.or

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2011-02-02 Thread vtorri
Quoting Mike Blumenkrantz : > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:00:38 +0100 > vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote: > >> Quoting Mike Blumenkrantz : >> >> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:38:56 +0100 >> > vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> changelog ? should this be pushed to 1.0 ? >> >> >> >> Quoting Enlightenment SV

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2011-02-01 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:00:38 +0100 vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote: > Quoting Mike Blumenkrantz : > > > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:38:56 +0100 > > vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote: > > > >> > >> changelog ? should this be pushed to 1.0 ? > >> > >> Quoting Enlightenment SVN : > >> > > whoops, forgot changelog. as

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2011-02-01 Thread vtorri
Quoting Mike Blumenkrantz : > On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:38:56 +0100 > vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote: > >> >> changelog ? should this be pushed to 1.0 ? >> >> Quoting Enlightenment SVN : >> > whoops, forgot changelog. ask the other mike about 1.0, I'm not sure > it's even > used? no. It's *you* who dec

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2011-02-01 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:38:56 +0100 vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote: > > changelog ? should this be pushed to 1.0 ? > > Quoting Enlightenment SVN : > whoops, forgot changelog. ask the other mike about 1.0, I'm not sure it's even used? -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50%

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2011-02-01 Thread vtorri
changelog ? should this be pushed to 1.0 ? Quoting Enlightenment SVN : > Log: > From: Mike McCormack > Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH] Remove SIGRT stuff > > Unused, and doesn't work as it stands. Delete... > > > Author: discomfitor > Date: 2011-02-01 17:27:24 -0800 (Tue, 01 Feb 201

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2011-01-28 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 08:43:42 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri wrote: > > ChangeLog... > > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote: forgot -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off! -- Specia

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2011-01-28 Thread Vincent Torri
ChangeLog... On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > From: Mike McCormack > Subject: [E-devel] [PATCH] ecore main loop "fd_handlers_to_call" list > optimization > Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:22:13 +0900 > > Hi All, > > Rather than using malloc'ed list entries in the mail loop,

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-11-30 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:07:53 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > > > Log: > > switch to EINA_BOOL values for delete_me, fix huge O(n) behavior in > > _ecore_main_fd_handlers_call; all fd operations now should see an > > exponential speed increa

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-11-30 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > switch to EINA_BOOL values for delete_me, fix huge O(n) behavior in > _ecore_main_fd_handlers_call; all fd operations now should see an exponential > speed increase based on the number of fds that ecore is watching next time, split the co

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-11-30 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:34:49 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN" wrote: > Log: > switch to EINA_BOOL values for delete_me, fix huge O(n) behavior in > _ecore_main_fd_handlers_call; all fd operations now should see an exponential > speed increase based on the number of fds that ecore is watching > > Autho

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-11-23 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:34:54 -0200 > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >> Ops, you've screwed it all! >> >> Non-opt does not include argv[0], if no opts the correct return is argc! > That makes no sense.  You can't do argv[argc].  If th

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-11-23 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:34:54 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > Ops, you've screwed it all! > > Non-opt does not include argv[0], if no opts the correct return is argc! That makes no sense. You can't do argv[argc]. If there are no other non '-' options, argv[0] IS the first arg in argv wh

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-11-23 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Ops, you've screwed it all! Non-opt does not include argv[0], if no opts the correct return is argc! The logic to users should be: If < 0: error Else if == argc: no non-opt args Else: non-opt args from it to argc On Tuesday, November 23, 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: >  I'm tired of

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-11-16 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > scaling optimizations round 2: add list for fd handler buffer functions > also delete fdhs from prep/buf lists on cleanups when possible shouldn't that stuff be done after 1.0 ? Vincent > > Author: discomfitor > Date: 2010

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-11-13 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: >  revert bitfielding of a bool to avoid possible abi break it's not just api break, it wouldn't work as the code gets a reference to it AFAIK (can't check the code now) -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-11-06 Thread Vincent Torri
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > add ecore_con strings > > Author: discomfitor > Date: 2010-11-06 10:06:56 -0700 (Sat, 06 Nov 2010) > New Revision: 54241 > > Modified: > trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore.c I think that those strings should not go into ecore.c

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-08-01 Thread Vincent Torri
forget it, you removed it in a commit later Vincent On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > >> Log: >> add data freeing support to ecore thread data api >> TO FUTURE MIKE: you were too tired to update the doxy last night and >> instead

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-08-01 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > add data freeing support to ecore thread data api > TO FUTURE MIKE: you were too tired to update the doxy last night and instead > of writing the doxy updates you fell > asl

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-07-23 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > correctly init some variables that I missed somehow. I blame Sachiel. > > Author: discomfitor > Date: 2010-07-23 15:28:18 -0700 (Fri, 23 Jul 2010) > New Revision: 50465 > > Modified: > trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore_thread.

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-07-21 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > Because it's easier for people unfamiliar with it to read the code this > way and they're static variables. you know how people's way of thinking ? What is important is having a consistent code. Even static variables. Vincent > On Tue, 20 Ju

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-07-21 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
Because it's easier for people unfamiliar with it to read the code this way and they're static variables. On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:54:41 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > > > Log: > > some variable renames to make this easier to understand

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore

2010-07-20 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > some variable renames to make this easier to understand > > Author: discomfitor > Date: 2010-07-20 02:40:53 -0700 (Tue, 20 Jul 2010) > New Revision: 50376 > > Modified: > trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore/ecore_thread.c > > Modified: