On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:24:32 +0100
Vincent Torri wrote:
> backport to 1.1
>
> Vincent
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
> > Log:
> > fix a pair of buffer overflows from r65619
> >
> >
> > Author: discomfitor
> > Date: 2011-12-12 11:59:25 -0800 (Mon,
backport to 1.1
Vincent
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> fix a pair of buffer overflows from r65619
>
>
> Author: discomfitor
> Date: 2011-12-12 11:59:25 -0800 (Mon, 12 Dec 2011)
> New Revision: 66121
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e
awesome!
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Jun 22, 2011 10:51 PM, "Enlightenment SVN"
wrote:
> Log:
> From: Vincent Torri
> To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster trunk/edje/src/lib
> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:32:41 +0200 (CEST)
>
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, En
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Tom Haste wrote:
Removing it would bring the same effect (if its in its own commit like
this) and would be easier since youre not double handing stuff if it
is a useless variable, imho.
i can but to agree. +1
Vincent
On 1 August 2010 16:19, wrote:
Because someone m
Removing it would bring the same effect (if its in its own commit like
this) and would be easier since youre not double handing stuff if it
is a useless variable, imho.
Toma
On 1 August 2010 16:19, wrote:
> Because someone may have put them in and forgotten to use them. By
> reading the comm
Because someone may have put them in and forgotten to use them. By
reading the commit diff, they may remember and do something with the
code.
--
Mike Blumenkrantz
Zentific: Our boolean values are huge.
--
The Palm PDK H
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> comment out unused variables
why not removing them ?
Vincent
>
> Author: discomfitor
> Date: 2010-07-30 22:01:54 -0700 (Fri, 30 Jul 2010)
> New Revision: 50705
>
> Modified:
> trunk/edje/src/lib/edje_edit.c trunk/edje/src/
