I changed the code about the part which was discussed with you.
So the item which is lower than standard priority is located in more menu
or panel.
I cannot say that hidding the item, in spite of the enough space, is better
than showing them always.
But someone may want to expand the width of item
On Tue, 29 May 2012 23:26:15 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Jaehwan Kim
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, the items of toolbar already have a priority. If the toolbar cannot
> > shrink anymore by downscaling the window size,
> > the more item is shown and the items wh
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Jaehwan Kim wrote:
> Yes, the items of toolbar already have a priority. If the toolbar cannot
> shrink anymore by downscaling the window size,
> the more item is shown and the items which has low priority are just shown
> by clicking the more item.
>
> We need to
Yes, the items of toolbar already have a priority. If the toolbar cannot
shrink anymore by downscaling the window size,
the more item is shown and the items which has low priority are just shown
by clicking the more item.
We need to hide items even if the toolbar size is not minimum.
So I suggest,
Don't we have priority already? AFAIR we introduced it because of that
reason! :)
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, Jaehwan Kim wrote:
> Dear Gustavo
>
> I considered your opinion and devised a method for more panel.
> The screen of mobile device is small. So the option that the main tab items
> are show
Dear Gustavo
I considered your opinion and devised a method for more panel.
The screen of mobile device is small. So the option that the main tab items
are shown and the others are hidden is needed sometime in it.
The standard is necessary in order to divide the main items and the others.
If the n
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Jaehwan Kim
> wrote:
>> Dear Gustavo
>>
>>
>> 2012년 5월 23일 수요일에 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri님이 작성:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> what's the use case in setting a maximum number of items manually?
>>>
>>
>> I
Hello,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Jaehwan Kim wrote:
> Dear Gustavo
>
>
> 2012년 5월 23일 수요일에 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri님이 작성:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> what's the use case in setting a maximum number of items manually?
>>
>
> If we want to expand the size of items as window size, we will use
> ELM_TOOLBA
Dear Gustavo
2012년 5월 23일 수요일에 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri님이 작성:
> Hi,
>
> what's the use case in setting a maximum number of items manually?
>
If we want to expand the size of items as window size, we will use
ELM_TOOLBAR_SHRINK_EXPAND mode.
At that time, if the items are more than what we want t
Hi,
what's the use case in setting a maximum number of items manually?
To me this seems like a hack. It should be defined based on the available
space. Otherwise you'll get horrible user interfaces by changing screen
resolution, or even screen orientation in mobile devices.
Then please explain w
spank spank.
1) wrong formatting in edc and c.
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/68821
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/68823
2) warnings + bug
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/68816
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> L
11 matches
Mail list logo
