On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:15:12 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN"
said:
i've backed this out as this makes things worse... like stopping compiling from
being possible. see my commit log.
> Log:
> Bug fix - about type change in group inherit.
> Lately, raster removed the code about the prohibition of type
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Enlightenment SVN <
no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
> Log:
> Bug fix - about type change in group inherit.
> Lately, raster removed the code about the prohibition of type-change in
> group inherit.
> But about the "part" of different type, the data structure
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:19:10 -0200
Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote:
> 2011/11/14 Iván Briano (Sachiel) :
> > 2011/11/14 Enlightenment SVN :
> >> Log:
> >> rel1.to: ""; fix build error.
> >> Actually, if rel1.to_x is not used in the matched description of the
> >> parent group, rel1.to_x: ""; doesn't
2011/11/14 Iván Briano (Sachiel) :
> 2011/11/14 Enlightenment SVN :
>> Log:
>> rel1.to: ""; fix build error.
>> Actually, if rel1.to_x is not used in the matched description of the parent
>> group, rel1.to_x: ""; doesn't need to be used in the description of the
>> child group.
>> Because its s
2011/11/14 Enlightenment SVN :
> Log:
> rel1.to: ""; fix build error.
> Actually, if rel1.to_x is not used in the matched description of the parent
> group, rel1.to_x: ""; doesn't need to be used in the description of the child
> group.
> Because its state is already default. But sometime we ma
