On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
Vincent
Author: quaker
Date: 2010-01-25 10:53:21 -0800 (Mon, 25 Jan 2010)
New Revision:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
i would like to add that, before giving giving svn rights to
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
i would like to add that, before giving giving svn rights to someone, we
usually like that this person does
I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
the process.
On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Quaker quake...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
New e17 packager -
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Quaker wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
i would like to add that, before giving giving svn rights to someone,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote:
I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
the process.
it's not our job to package our libs and binaries... It's the job of the
package managers of
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Stephen Houston unixti...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
the process.
It's a common process and good practice to let people first send
On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Albin Tonnerre albin.tonne...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:07 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote:
I don't think this is a problem...
On this server, having user on server is connected with svn account. They
don't commit, it is just for those ssh reasons. I know it is not a best way.
I'll prepare some new system for next freeze.
2010/1/25 Albin Tonnerre albin.tonne...@gmail.com
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:42 +0100, Quaker wrote :
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:22 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Albin Tonnerre
albin.tonne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:07 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010,
i don't maintain debian stuff directly in libs/apps' dirs anymore. They are
in separated directory packaging and they are updated and merged with
generated snapshots. Anyway, i know svn account created just for ssh is bad.
I'll find a better solution and discuss it with raster.
2010/1/25 Albin
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:42:54 +0100 Quaker quake...@gmail.com said:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
i would like to add that,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:46:40 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr
said:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
?? how many people involved in
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:58:48 +0100 Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr said:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Stephen Houston unixti...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
14 matches
Mail list logo
