I'm fine with dir or E_Connman0_7x.h :-)
On Tuesday, November 22, 2011, Carsten Haitzler
wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:59:16 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:12:46 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:59:16 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:12:46 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz
> > said:
> >
> >
> > > imo we should always attempt to provide backwards compatibility for as
> > > long a
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:59:16 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:12:46 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz
> > said:
> >
> >
> > > imo we should always attempt to provide backwards compatibility for as
> > > long a
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:12:46 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said:
>
>
> > imo we should always attempt to provide backwards compatibility for as long
> > as
> > possible. I recently updated the notification stuff to use the new spec
> > whil
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:38:56 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
said:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:59:43 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
> > said:
> >
> >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> >> wrote:
> >> > Log:
> >> > gustavo - i know you
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:00:20 +1100 Jochen Schröder said:
> On 20/11/11 18:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:59:43 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
> > said:
> >
> >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> >> wrote:
> >>> Log:
> >>> gustavo - i know you
On 20/11/11 18:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:59:43 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
> said:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Enlightenment SVN
>> wrote:
>>> Log:
>>> gustavo - i know you don't like this, but putting back old connman api
>>> support.
>>>
>>>
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:59:43 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
> said:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Enlightenment SVN
>> wrote:
>> > Log:
>> > gustavo - i know you don't like this, but putting back old connman api
>> > support.
>> >
>> >
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:59:43 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
said:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
> > Log:
> > gustavo - i know you don't like this, but putting back old connman api
> > support.
> >
> > 1. you broke connman legacy support during feature freeze. this isn't
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:59:43 -0200 Lucas De Marchi
said:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
> > Log:
> > gustavo - i know you don't like this, but putting back old connman api
> > support.
> >
> > 1. you broke connman legacy support during feature freeze. this isn't
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler
>>> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:12:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> gustavo - i know you don't like this, but putting back old connman api
> support.
>
> 1. you broke connman legacy support during feature freeze. this isn't
> a bug fix. it's a break.
> 2. newer connmans are broken for me - my n
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:12:46 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz
>>> said:
imo we should always a
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:12:46 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz
>> said:
>>> imo we should always attempt to provide backwards compatibility for as long
>>> as
>>> possible.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:12:46 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said:
>> imo we should always attempt to provide backwards compatibility for as long
>> as
>> possible. I recently updated the notification stuff to use the new spec while
>> still che
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:12:46 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said:
> imo we should always attempt to provide backwards compatibility for as long as
> possible. I recently updated the notification stuff to use the new spec while
> still checking for old-style messages, and my e17 pulseaudio code supports
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:08:40 -0800
"Enlightenment SVN" wrote:
> Log:
> gustavo - i know you don't like this, but putting back old connman api
> support.
>
> 1. you broke connman legacy support during feature freeze. this isn't
> a bug fix. it's a break.
> 2. newer connmans are broken f
17 matches
Mail list logo
