Re: [E-devel] Edje Lua changes needed for Lua 5.2 (the current release as of last month)

2012-01-05 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 16:44:15 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: we could just stick to 5.1 :) i think we should until lua is totally fleshed out and complete anyway :) Just quickly looking through the documentation, this is stuff we might have to deal with for Lua 5.2 - Weak tables

Re: [E-devel] Edje Lua changes needed for Lua 5.2 (the current release as of last month)

2012-01-05 Thread David Seikel
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:51:40 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 16:44:15 +1000 David Seikel onef...@gmail.com said: we could just stick to 5.1 :) i think we should until lua is totally fleshed out and complete anyway :) Sure, I see that

Re: [E-devel] Edje Lua changes needed for Lua 5.2 (the current release as of last month)

2012-01-03 Thread David Seikel
I'm gonna experiment with using LuaJIT to. Though the FFI parts of it are sandbox unfriendly. I might be able to sandbox FFI enough to make raster happy. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world. signature.asc

[E-devel] Edje Lua changes needed for Lua 5.2 (the current release as of last month)

2012-01-02 Thread David Seikel
Just quickly looking through the documentation, this is stuff we might have to deal with for Lua 5.2 - Weak tables with weak keys now perform like ephemeron tables. We use a weak table, but not with a weak key. Still, may need to keep an eye on this. Function luaL_register is deprecated. Use