Dear All,
Today I tried building elm on a machine that has ecore without ecore
con. On that machine elm's build failed because of elm_map using
ecore_con_url without ifdefs.
Reverting vtorri's last commit fixed it, but I'm not sure if that's the
way to go because his commit looks correct (but
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:24:33 +0300 Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> Today I tried building elm on a machine that has ecore without ecore
> con. On that machine elm's build failed because of elm_map using
> ecore_con_url without ifdefs.
>
> Reverting vtorri's last commit fixed it, but I'm not sure if that'
On 10/07/11 15:10, David Seikel wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:24:33 +0300 Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
>
>> Today I tried building elm on a machine that has ecore without ecore
>> con. On that machine elm's build failed because of elm_map using
>> ecore_con_url without ifdefs.
>>
>> Reverting vtorri's
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 15:15:57 +0300 Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> On 10/07/11 15:10, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:24:33 +0300 Tom Hacohen
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Today I tried building elm on a machine that has ecore without
> >> ecore con. On that machine elm's build failed because of elm_
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Today I tried building elm on a machine that has ecore without ecore con. On
> that machine elm's build failed because of elm_map using ecore_con_url
> without ifdefs.
>
> Reverting vtorri's last commit fixed it
i don't see how it can be
On 10/07/11 19:25, Vincent Torri wrote:
> i don't see how it can be possible to compile elm_map without any
> ecore_con checks in configure.ac. My commit was right and as I said, it
> was a first part of it.
>
As I said, I also think your commit was right, but it doesn't compile if
I don't reve
