On Friday 22 July 2005 04:20 pm, Brian Sakal wrote:
> Hi. I was thinking as long as we're making
> unecessary-but-still-kind-of-cool apps like exposé, I figured I may get
> started on a xosd clone (eosd) since one needs gnome crap for xosd...
read the list, one already exists, it just needs updati
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:20:54 -0500 Brian Sakal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi. I was thinking as long as we're making
> unecessary-but-still-kind-of-cool apps like expos__, I figured I may get
> started on a xosd clone (eosd) since one needs gnome crap for xosd...
> Does anyone think this is us
On Monday 25 July 2005 12:45 pm, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-22 13:39]:
> > last i checked though, it was a drop-in replacment for xosd (which would
> > be sweet i think ... have it install an optional xosd.h which provides
> > wrapper API to eosd calls)
>
I got started on one using Evas since I was only able to fix some linker
errors. However, it won't be a library, it will be a command-line app since
making text appear in OSD form is only a few lines of code. But, I have a
question: how does one make an Evas transparent (so that only the text on
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-22 13:39]:
> On Friday 22 July 2005 04:20 pm, Brian Sakal wrote:
> > I figured I may get
> > started on a xosd clone (eosd) since one needs gnome crap for xosd...
>
> esod already exists ... it probably needs to be updated to the new api's
> though ...
Oh, I'm never discouraged... I've got other projects that hopefully will work
:-)
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:16:40 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 22 July 2005 07:29 pm, Brian Alfredo Sakal wrote:
> > Heh, nevermind then :-P.
>
> that wasnt meant to discourage you ...
>
On Friday 22 July 2005 07:29 pm, Brian Alfredo Sakal wrote:
> Heh, nevermind then :-P.
that wasnt meant to discourage you ...
that package could use a lot of love and features ... i dont think tilman has
touched it in a while
-mike
---
SF.Net
Heh, nevermind then :-P.
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:39:03 -0400
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 22 July 2005 04:20 pm, Brian Sakal wrote:
> > I figured I may get
> > started on a xosd clone (eosd) since one needs gnome crap for xosd...
>
> esod already exists ... it probably ne
On Friday 22 July 2005 04:20 pm, Brian Sakal wrote:
> I figured I may get
> started on a xosd clone (eosd) since one needs gnome crap for xosd...
esod already exists ... it probably needs to be updated to the new api's
though ...
ftp://code-monkey.de/pub/eosd/eosd-0.1.0.tar.gz
last i checked th
Hi. I was thinking as long as we're making
unecessary-but-still-kind-of-cool apps like exposé, I figured I may get
started on a xosd clone (eosd) since one needs gnome crap for xosd...
Does anyone think this is useful? Also, maybe a root-tail clone as a
module since modules draw only to the root wi
10 matches
Mail list logo