On 01/18/2013 02:05 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Christopher Michael
> wrote:
>> Oh, I agree that it is not mandatory for someone to work in the "right"
>> way in order to do the switch...However, after the switch is done and
>> you are expecting people to change thei
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:54:28 +0100 Cedric BAIL
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:23 AM, David Seikel
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:17:33 +0100 Jérémy Zurcher
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sunday 20 January 2013 01:36, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> >> > The current plan is to use phabricator, not cgit
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:23 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:17:33 +0100 Jérémy Zurcher
> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 20 January 2013 01:36, Tom Hacohen wrote :
>> > The current plan is to use phabricator, not cgit. As Alex has
>> > mentioned.
>>
>> ;) I understood well, and I don't
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:17:33 +0100 Jérémy Zurcher
wrote:
> On Sunday 20 January 2013 01:36, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> > The current plan is to use phabricator, not cgit. As Alex has
> > mentioned.
>
> ;) I understood well, and I don't challenge phabricator, it seems to
> be a nice tool for code rev
On Sunday 20 January 2013 01:36, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> The current plan is to use phabricator, not cgit. As Alex has mentioned.
;) I understood well, and I don't challenge phabricator, it seems to be
a nice tool for code review, comments, info exchange, etc.
I don't know why you install trac bes
The current plan is to use phabricator, not cgit. As Alex has mentioned.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Saturday 19 January 2013 19:32, Alex-P. Natsios wrote :
> > I don't really think there is much point to adding one more repo browser.
> >
> > Phabricator has an
On Saturday 19 January 2013 19:32, Alex-P. Natsios wrote :
> I don't really think there is much point to adding one more repo browser.
>
> Phabricator has an integrated repo browser which should be pretty much
> adequate for the current state of the project (and possible repo
> splittings).
>
I'
I don't really think there is much point to adding one more repo browser.
Phabricator has an integrated repo browser which should be pretty much
adequate for the current state of the project (and possible repo
splittings).
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
> On Friday 18 Jan
On Friday 18 January 2013 11:36, Tom Hacohen wrote :
> I didn't elaborate on that because we didn't finish our "internal
> testing". But at the moment we are using gitolite for access control
> which looks pretty good.
gitolite is awsome,
do you plan to add http://git.zx2c4.com/cgit to your set
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 02:08:24 +1000 David Seikel said:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:57:59 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Bruno Dilly
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen
> > > wrote:
> > >> Hey guys,
> > >>
> > >> Daniel and I have
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:57:59 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Bruno Dilly
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen
> > wrote:
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git while
> >> keeping complete history. W
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:58:32 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Cedric BAIL
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Christopher Michael
> > wrote:
> >> On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >>> On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 18/0
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:58:32 +0900
Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Christopher Michael
> > wrote:
> >> On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >>> On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 18/01/
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Christopher Michael
> wrote:
>> On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote:
On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barb
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Bruno Dilly wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git while keeping
>> complete history. We believe we got it figured out, we'll share the
>> results on Monday.
>> As for
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:21:45 + Christopher Michael
wrote:
> On 18/01/13 14:12, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:05:24 + Tom Hacohen
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 18/01/13 13:53, Christopher Michael wrote:
> >>> On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 18/01/13 13:32, Christ
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git while keeping
> complete history. We believe we got it figured out, we'll share the
> results on Monday.
> As for phabricator: We have it configured and running.
>
> Both of t
On 18/01/13 14:12, David Seikel wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:05:24 + Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
>
>> On 18/01/13 13:53, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>> On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 18/
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:05:24 + Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> On 18/01/13 13:53, Christopher Michael wrote:
> > On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >> On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote:
> >>> On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Christopher Michael
wrote:
> On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>> On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom
On 18/01/13 13:53, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>> On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 18/01/13 13:38, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote:
>> On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Bar
On 18/01/13 13:32, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>>
>>> On Friday, January
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>
>> On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>>
>>
On 18/01/13 13:27, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>
>> On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>>
>> Hi
On 18/01/13 11:47, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen
>>> >
>>> wrote:
Hey guys,
Daniel and I have been
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:32:35 + Michael Blumenkrantz
said:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
> barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
>
> > On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen > >
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:47:25 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> > On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >
> >> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 A
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:51:18 + Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> On 18/01/13 10:37, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:13:52 + Tom Hacohen
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git while
> >> keeping complete history. We believe we got it figured out, we'l
On Friday, January 18, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
>> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen >> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hey guys,
Daniel and I have been work
On 18/01/13 11:29, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen
>> >
>> wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git while keeping
>>> complete history. W
On 18/01/13 11:20, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git while keeping
>> complete history. We believe we got it figured out, we'll share the
>> results on Monday.
>
> How e
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen >
> > wrote:
> > > Hey guys,
> > >
> > > Daniel and I have been working on migratin
On Friday, January 18, 2013, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen
> >
> wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git while keeping
> > complete history. We believe we got it figured out, we'll share the
> > result
Hi Tom,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git while keeping
> complete history. We believe we got it figured out, we'll share the
> results on Monday.
How everything is going to work with git? Will we have just
On 18/01/13 10:37, David Seikel wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:13:52 + Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
>
>> Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git while keeping
>> complete history. We believe we got it figured out, we'll share the
>> results on Monday.
>> As for phabricator: We have it
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:13:52 + Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git while keeping
> complete history. We believe we got it figured out, we'll share the
> results on Monday.
> As for phabricator: We have it configured and running.
>
> Both of them are
Hey guys,
Daniel and I have been working on migrating SVN to git while keeping
complete history. We believe we got it figured out, we'll share the
results on Monday.
As for phabricator: We have it configured and running.
Both of them are running on a clean VM so it'll be easy to move it to e5
39 matches
Mail list logo
