On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Dave Ray wrote:
> On May 24, 2011, at 1:37 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Dave Ray wrote:
The directory http://www.enlightenment.org/~cedric/ is missing embryo.
>>>
>>> Embry
On May 24, 2011, at 1:37 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Dave Ray wrote:
>>> The directory http://www.enlightenment.org/~cedric/ is missing embryo.
>>
>> Embryo didn't need any fix, so doesn't need a 1.0.1 release.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Dave Ray wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote:
We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
>>>
Hi,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Dave Ray wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
>>> release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
>>> tarball from http://www.enlightenment.org/~cedric/ .
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Eduardo Felipe wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Dave Ray wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote:
Hi devs,
We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
tarball fro
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Dave Ray wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
>>> release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
>>> tarball from http://www.enlightenment
> On Mon, 23 May 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
>> release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
>> tarball from http://www.enlightenment.org/~cedric/ . As this is not
>> trunk, you can't use
On Mon, 23 May 2011, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
> release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
> tarball from http://www.enlightenment.org/~cedric/ . As this is not
> trunk, you can't use the appli
Hi,
> We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
> release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
> tarball from http://www.enlightenment.org/~cedric/ . As this is not
> trunk, you can't use the application in svn to test it, but should
> rather try t
Hi devs,
We are ready to ship 1.0.1, but before that and to avoid a borked
release, could some of you test either the 1.0 branch, or directly the
tarball from http://www.enlightenment.org/~cedric/ . As this is not
trunk, you can't use the application in svn to test it, but should
rather try the on
10 matches
Mail list logo